Cases 1 - 10 of 10
SMITH et al v. USA
as 1:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
GERALD F. SMITH, JR. and KAYE D. SMITH
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Smith v. McDonough
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 24-1028
Claimant:
KITTOM SMITH, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Smith v. US
as 21-1431
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHIU YU CHANG, JOSEPH A. GARCIA, JEAN-FRANCOIS BONNETE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
SMITH v. USA
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2014cv00165
Plaintiff:
LANKWARD L. SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
KEENER V US
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 08-5004
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Anne D. Smith, Kenneth C. Keener and William P. Smith, Jr.
Defendant-Appellee:
United States
ADAIR V US
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 06-5077
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Alan Thomason, Alfredo Arias, Allen Edenfield and others
Defendant-Appellee:
United States
SMITH V DVA
as 02-7361
Respondent-Appellee:
ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Claimant-Appellant:
PAUL R. SMITH, JR.
SMITH V US
as 02-5063
Plaintiff-Appellant:
JAMES SOLOMAN SMITH, JR., JAMES SOLOMAN SMITH, JR., JAMES SOLOMAN SMITH, JR. and others
Defendant-Appellee:
UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES and others
SMITH V VA
as 01-3144
Petitioner:
ANTHONY A. SMITH, JR., ANTHONY A. SMITH, JR. and ANTHONY A. SMITH, JR.
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.