Cases 1 - 10 of 43
STEINHOUR v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv02175
Petitioner:
STEVE M. STEINHOUR
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Dasso International, Inc. v. MOSO North America, Inc.
as 24-1135
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DASSO INTERNATIONAL, INC. and EASOON USA, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
MOSO NORTH AMERICA, INC. and MOSO INTERNATIONAL BV
Defendant:
BRETT KELLY, MARK CLIFTON and DAVID S. OSTERMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID S. OSTERMAN, aka Steve Osterman
Dasso International, Inc. v. MOSO North America, Inc.
as 24-1178
Plaintiff:
DASSO INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EASOON USA, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
MOSO NORTH AMERICA, INC., MOSO INTERNATIONAL BV, BRETT KELLY and others
MOBLEY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01324
Petitioner:
STEVE MOBLEY
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
BARCUS v. USA
as 1:2023cv01265
Plaintiff:
STEVE BARCUS
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
CREWS et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
SUE CREWS, PHIL CREWS, AMY LEE and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
GurveyIn re: Gurvey
as 23-134
Petitioner:
In re: AMY REBECCA GURVEY
Respondent:
COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C., CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., LIVE NATION, INC. and others
ADAMS et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv00696
Plaintiff:
LEE ADAMS, NEAL AGARWAL, PERI ALKAS and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
CANTALUPO v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00388
Petitioner:
STEVE CANTALUPO
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Tube-Mac Industries, Inc. v. Campbell
as 22-2170
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TUBE-MAC INDUSTRIES, INC., GARY MACKAY and DAN HEWSON
Defendant / Appellant:
STEVE CAMPBELL
Defendant:
TRANZGAZ, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
