Cases 1 - 10 of 140
BAUER et al v. USA
as 1:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
ROBERT F. BAUER, LAURA S. BAUER, RICHARD KENT COMPTON and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Haggart v. US
as 24-1256
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HAGGART, KATHY HAGGART, Husband and Wife, For Themselves and As Representatives of a Class of Similarly Situated Persons, GORDON ARTHUR WOODLEY, Personal Counsel for Kittinger Deed Claimants and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENISE LYNN WOODLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
WILCOX v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01752
Petitioner:
SUSAN WILCOX
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
DAVIS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01736
Petitioner:
SUSAN DAVIS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
YORK v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01698
Petitioner:
SUSAN YORK
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
BROWN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01586
Petitioner:
SUSAN BROWN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
AMINI et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01428
Plaintiff:
SUSAN ELAINE BUTLER, FARIDEH E. AMINI, ROSS C. ANDERSON and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
SAMUELI et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01444
Plaintiff:
HENRY F. SAMUELI, SUSAN F. SAMUELI and HENRY SAMUELI
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
TOLER ATWELL et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01316
Plaintiff:
REGENA J. TOLER ATWELL, HELEN BANREVI doing business as GQ CLEANERS, BRADY HETHERWICK and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
