Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Cohen v. American Airlines, Inc.
as 20-3426
Defendant / Appellee:
American Airlines Group, Inc. and American Airlines, Inc.
Defendant:
John Does 1-5 and Jane Does 1-5
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Aryeh Cohen
In re: AMR Corporation
as 19-4378
Plaintiff / Appellant:
M. Alicia Sikes, John Krakowski and Kevin Horner
Defendant / Appellee:
Allied Pilots Association and American Airlines, Inc.
Debtor:
In re: AMR Corporation
In re: AMR Corporation
as 19-3506
Appellant:
Kevin Horner, M. Alicia Sikes and John Krakowski
Appellee:
American Airlines, Inc. and Allied Pilots Association
Debtor:
In re: AMR Corporation
In Re: Carolyn Fjord
as 19-513
Petitioner:
Gail S. Kosach, c/o David J. Cook, Esq. Cook Collection Attorneys, PLC P.O. Box 270 San Francisco, CA 94104-0270, Lisa McCarthy, c/o David J. Cook, Esq. Cook Collection Attorneys, PLC P.O. Box 270 San Francisco, CA 94104-0270, J. Michael Walker, c/o David J. Cook, Esq. Cook Collection Attorneys, PLC P.O. Box 270 San Francisco, CA 94104-027 and others
Respondent:
US Airways, Inc., Kobre & Kim LLP 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022, US Airways Group, Inc., American Airlines, Inc. and others
US Airways, Inc., for American v. Sabre Holdings Corporation
as 17-983
Plaintiff - Appellant:
US Airways, Inc., for American Airlines, Inc. as Successor and Real Party in Interest
Defendant - Appellee:
Sabre Holdings Corporation, Sabre Travel International Limited and Sabre GLBL Inc.
Defendant:
Sabre Inc.
US Airways, Inc., for American v. Sabre Holdings Corporation
as 17-983
Plaintiff / Appellant:
US Airways, Inc., for American Airlines, Inc. as Successor and Real Party in Interest
Defendant / Appellee:
Sabre Holdings Corporation, Sabre Travel International Limited and Sabre GLBL Inc.
Defendant:
Sabre Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
Travelers United, Inc., David S. Evans, Professor Richard Schmalensee and others
US Airways, Inc., for American v. Sabre Holdings Corporation
as 17-960
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
US Airways, Inc., for American Airlines, Inc. as Successor and Real Party in Interest
Defendant:
Sabre Inc.
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Sabre Holdings Corporation, Sabre Travel International Limited and Sabre GLBL Inc.
DMJ Associates, L.L.C. v. Capasso
as 16-3435
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant:
DMJ Associates, L.L.C., AKA DMJ Associates, L.L.C.
Def-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Exxon Mobil Corporation and Quanta Resource Corporation
Defendant-Counter-Claimant:
Clairol, Incorporated, Basf Corporation, Powell Duffryn Terminals, Inc. and others
Third-Party-Plaintiff:
Paribas North America
Third-Party-Defendant:
EQ Northeast, Inc., AKA Franklin Environmental Services, Inc., FKA Franklin Pumping Service, Coastal Oil New York, Inc, Alcan Aluminum Corporation, AKA Alcan Sheet & Plate and others
Defendant:
Carl A. Capasso, Darling International, Inc., Russell W. Mahler and others
DMJ Associates, L.L.C. v. Capasso
as 16-3435
Counter Claimant:
Clairol, Incorporated, Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc., Rockwell International Corporation and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, United States Department of the Air Force, Ingersoll-Rand Company and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Colonial Pipeline Company, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, United States Navy and others
Plaintiff:
DMJ Associates, L.L.C., AKA DMJ Associates, L.L.C.
Appellant:
Revere Copper Products, Inc., AKA Revere Copper & Brass Incorporated
In Re: September 11 Litigation
as 13-3619
Plaintiff:
World Trade Farmers Market, Incorporated, Adem Arici, Omer Ipek and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
World Trade Center Properties LLC, 2 World Trade Center LLC and 4 World Trade Center LLC
Claimant:
Ellen Mariani
Defendant / Appellee:
Huntleigh USA Corporation, UAL Corporation, Massachusetts Port Authority and others
Defendant:
Burns International Security Services Corporation, Emery Roth & Sons, P.C., Globe Airport Security Services, Incorporated and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of New York
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
