Other Statutes Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Inoa v. Dziduch
as 24-269
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOSE INOA
Defendant / Appellee: L.T. DZIDUCH, L.T. ENSER, L.T. DELANEY and others
Defendant: ATTICA C.F., Medical Personel John Doe(s); Jane Doe(s) and ATTICA C.F., Office of Mental Health, John Doe(s); Jane Doe(s)
Buczek v. Keybank, N.A.
as 23-7591
Plaintiff / Appellant: SHANE CHRISTOPHER BUCZEK
Defendant / Appellee: KEYBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, (Key Bank), CHRISTOPHER M. GORMAN, An Officer of Keybank, N.A. and an Individual, DAVID P. CASE, Esq., Fein, Such & Crane, LLP and others
Biehner v. City of New York
as 21-2922
Plaintiff / Appellant: Brittney Biehner, Brittney Reilly
Defendant / Appellee: New York City Department of Education, Omotayo Cineus, Steve Traversiere and others
Defendant: John Doe and Jane Doe #1-100, said names being fictitious, it being the intent of Plaintiff to designage any and all individuals, officers, members, agents, servants, and/or employees of the aforementioned agencies owing a duty of care to Plaintiff,
Cummings v. The City of New York
as 21-1380
Defendant / Appellee: Jumaane D. Williams, Angel Martinez, Coalition of Educational Justice and others
Defendant: New York Daily News, Dr. Andre Perry, The Hechinger Report, AKA Hechinger Institute of Education and the Media and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Patricia Cummings
Quinones v. City of New York
as 20-4019
Defendant / Appellee: Corrections Officer Sammy Fernandez, Shield No. 5335, Captain Adam Rollison, Shield No. 192, Corrections Officer Eric Wilson, Shield No. 11616 and others
Defendant: City of New York, Jane or John Doe, John and/or Jane Does, NYDOC Employees Nos. 1 through 10 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Jose M. Quinones
Raydo v. City of New York
as 20-3685
Plaintiff / Appellant: Melanie Raydo and Daniel Lang
Defendant: New York City Police Officer John Doe #1, individually, the names "John Doe" being fictitious as their complete names and/or current identities are presently unknown and New York City Police Officers John and Jane Does #2-#10, individually, the names John Doe" and "Jane Doe" being fictitious as their complete names and/or current identities are presently unknown
Defendant / Appellee: New York City Police Officer Eric Rodriguez, individually and City of New York
Juliao v. Charles Rutenberg Realty, Inc.
as 20-2053
Plaintiff / Appellant: Santiago Juliao
Defendant: John Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant / Appellee: Charles Rutenberg Realty, Inc.
5464 Route 212, LLC v. New York State Department of T
as 20-1616
Plaintiff / Appellant: 5464 Route 212, LLC and Robert Day
Defendant: John Does and Jane Does, individually and as Officials and/or Agents of the New York State Department of Transportation, DOT and Marie Therese Dominguez, individually and as Officials and/or agents of the New York State Department of Transportation, DOT
Defendant / Appellee: New York State Department of Transportation, DOT
Keller v. Schoharie County Department of
as 20-1430
Defendant / Appellee: Lana Baldwin, in her individual and official capacity, Sandy Woods, in her individual and official capacity and Schoharie County Department of Social Services
Defendant: John and/or Jane Doe, In his or her respective individual and official capacities with fictitious name intended to represent other potential defendant(s) who may have been involved in the incidents that violated plaintiff's federal rights, but whose
Plaintiff / Appellant: Cheryl Keller
DeLee v. Russo
as 19-3634
Defendant: Superintendent John Doe, or Jane Doe, Central Office of Class and Movement John Doe, Dept. Supt. of Security, John Doe, John Doe and others
Defendant / Appellee: Sergeant F. Deleaney, Correctional Officer, Joseph Rogers, Correctional Officer, Gowanda Correctional Facility, Mr. Gates, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Maurice L. DeLee

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?