Cases 1 - 10 of 11
United States of America, ex rel Don Hanks v. Amgen Inc.
as 23-28
Plaintiff:
State of California ex rel. Don Hanks, State of Delaware ex rel. Don Hanks, District of Columbia ex rel. Don Hanks and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
United States of America, ex rel Don Hanks
Defendant / Appellee:
Florida Cancer Specialists, Gulfcoast Oncology Associates, Integrated Community Oncology Network, LLC and others
Defendant:
Amgen Inc., Montgomery Cancer Center, Oncology Specialties, P.C. and others
Kloth-Zanard v. Bank of America
as 19-2043
Defendant / Appellee:
Specialized Loan Services and Bank of America
Defendant:
Wells Fargo/Northwest Bank Minnesota, Bank of New York Mellon, Mortgage Electronic Registration Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joan T. Kloth-Zanard and Joan Teresa Kloth-Zanard
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Miller v. Northwest Connecticut YMCA
as 19-1485
Defendant / Appellee:
Farmington Public High School, The Friendship Service Center, Connecticut Department of Housing and others
Defendant:
Veyo Connecticut NEMT
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Julie Ann Miller
United States of America v. American Express Company
as 15-1672
Amicus Curiae:
Michael A. Carrier, Law Professor, Bridgestone Americas Inc., Nestle Waters North America Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Abercrombie & Fitch Co., Saks Incorporated, Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Idaho, State of Iowa, State of Ohio and others
Defendant / Appellant:
American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. and American Express Company
Defendant:
Visa Inc. and Mastercard International Incorporated
Plaintiff:
State of Hawaii
Natural Resources Defense Coun v. United States Environmental Pr
as 14-39
Petitioner:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Northwest Environmental Advocates, Center for Biological Diversity and others
Respondent:
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Community Health Care Associat v. New York State Department of H
as 13-3454
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Community Health Care Association of New York, Anthony L. Jordan Health Center, Community Health Center of Buffalo, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
New York State Department of Health, State of New York and Does, 1-20
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Richard F. Daines, Medical Doctor, in his official capacity as Commissioner and Nirav R. Shah, Medical Doctor, in his official capacity as Commissioner
Community Health Care Associat v. New York State Department of H
as 13-3332
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Community Health Care Association of New York, Anthony L. Jordan Health Center, Brooklyn Plaza Medical Center, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
New York State Department of Health, Richard F. Daines, Medical Doctor, in his official capacity as Commissioner, Nirav R. Shah, Medical Doctor, in his official capacity as Commissioner and others
Natural Resources Defense Coun v. United States Environmental Pr
as 13-2393
Petitioner:
Center for Biological Diversity and Northwest Environmental Advocates
Respondent:
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Community Health Care Associat v. New York State Department of
as 13-991
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Community Health Care Association of New York, Anthony L. Jordan Health Center, Bedford Stuyvesant Family Health Center, Inc. and others
Defendant:
State of New York, New York State Department of Health and Does 1-20
Defendant - Appellant:
M.D. Richard F. Daines, in his official capacity as Commissioner and M.D. Nirav R. Shah, in his official capacity as Commissioner
Community Health Care Associat v. New York State Department of H
as 13-771
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Community Health Care Association of New York, Anthony L. Jordan Health Center, Bedford Stuyvesant Family Health Center, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Does 1-20
Defendant - Appellee:
M.D. Richard F. Daines, in his official capacity as Commissioner, New York State Department of Health and State of New York
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
