Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Russ McCullough v. World Wrestling Entertainment
as 21-3127
Plaintiff:
Michelle James, as mother and next friend of M.O., a Minor Child and T.O, a Minor Child, Jimmy Snuka, "Superfly", by and through his guardian, Carole Snuka, Salvador Guerrero, IV, AKA Chavo Guerrero, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Robert Windham, Thomas Billington, James Ware and others
Respondent:
Kyros Law P.C. and Konstantine W. Kyros
Defendant / Appellee:
World Wrestling Entertainment, Incorporated and Vincent K. McMahon, Individually and as The Trustee of the Vincent K. McMahon Irrevocable Trust U/T/A dtd. June 24, 2004, as the Trustee of the Vincent K. McMahon 2008, and as Special Trustee of the Vincent K. McMahon 2013 Irrev. Trust U/A dtd. Decem
Frei v. Taro Pharmaceutical U.S.A., In
as 20-1208
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mona Windham, Billy West, Annie Jones and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Taro Pharmaceutical U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Frisco, Marie Hubler, Ray Hubler and others
Defendant:
Does 1-10, ABC Corporations or Entities 1-50 and John and Jane Does 1 - 50
In Re: World Trade Center Lowe
as 19-2934
Plaintiff:
Daria Janina Wszolkowska, As Administrator of the Estate of Dariusz Wszolkowski, Monica Arce, Marek Socha and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
William Rodriguez, Maria Alvarez, Leonardo Naranjo and others
Defendant:
The Bank of New York, Ann Taylor Stores Corporation, Weston Solutions, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
WTC Captive Insurance Company, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
Battery Park City Authority
Palin v. The New York Times Company
as 17-3801
Amicus Curiae:
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Buzzfeed, Inc., Home Box Office, Inc and others
Defendant / Appellee:
The New York Times Company
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sarah Palin, an individual
Cabello-Rondon v. Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
as 17-2895
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Diosdado Cabello-Rondon
Defendant - Appellee:
Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Defendant:
News Corporation
Jones v. State of Connecticut Superior
as 17-1932
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Matthew Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
State of Connecticut Superior Court, Laura Lodge, Mental Health, New Haven Superior Court, Yale University and others
Estrella-Jones v. United States of America
as 17-102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Brenda Estrella-Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America
In re: Facebook, Inc., IPO Sec
as 14-3800
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Nelson, individually and behalf of all others similarly situated, Rock Southward, Derivatively on Behalf of Himself &All Others Similarly Situated, Avatar Securities, LLC and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert Lowinger
Defendant - Appellee:
Goldman, Sachs & Co., Facebook, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and others
Defendant:
Barclays Capital Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, BMO Capital Markets Corp. and others
Amicus Curiae:
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
In re: Facebook, Inc., IPO Sec
as 14-1788
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Nelson, individually and behalf of all others similarly situated, Rock Southward, Derivatively on Behalf of Himself &All Others Similarly Situated, Avatar Securities, LLC and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
William Cole, Derivatively on Behalf of Facebook, Inc.
Defendant:
Barclays Capital Inc., Marc L. Andreessen, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Facebook, Inc., a Delaware corporation
In re: Facebook, Inc., IPO Sec
as 14-1784
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Nelson, individually and behalf of all others similarly situated, Rock Southward, Derivatively on Behalf of Himself &All Others Similarly Situated, Avatar Securities, LLC and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Lidia Levy, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
Barclays Capital Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Erskine B. Bowles and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Facebook, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
