Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank v. Morgan Stanley & Co. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-2095
Plaintiff: Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank, individually, on behalf of all others similarly situated, King County, Washington, Together and on Behalf of all others similarly situated, SEI Investments Company, Together and on Behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Public School Employees' Retirement System, Together and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Commerzbank AG, Together and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: Morgan Stanley & Co., Incorporated, Morgan Stanley & Co. International Limited, The Bank of New York Mellon, formerly known as The Bank of New York and others
IN RE: Merrill Lynch &Co., Inc
as 13-1980
Plaintiff: Robert Berzin, Michael Bonde, Ronald Levy and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Louisiana Pacific Corp.
Defendant - Appellee: FGIC Corporation, Merrill Lynch & Co, Inc., Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. and others
Cordell v. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc
as 12-4481
Plaintiff - Appellant: Bob Cordell, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Tsereteli v. Residential Asset Securitizati
as 12-4411
Plaintiff - Appellee: Vaszurele Ltd. and Vasili Tsereteli, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant: Residential Asset Securitization Trust, 2006-A8, Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Defendant - Appellant: Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC
Tsereteli v. Residential Asset Securitizati
as 12-2790
Plaintiff: Vasili Tsereteli, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Petitioner: Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC
Respondent: Vaszurele Ltd.
Defendant: Moody's Investors Service, Inc., McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc and Residential Asset Securitization Trust 2006-A8
Public Employees' Retirement S v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
as 12-2366
Plaintiff - Appellee: Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi, Individually, on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Moody's Investors Service, Inc., Fitch Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant: Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company, GS Mortgage Securities Corp. and others
New Jersey Carpenters Health F v. The Royal Bank of Scotland Gro We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1707
Plaintiff - Appellant: New Jersey Carpenters Health Fund, on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant: Moodys Investors Service, Inc and The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee: The Royal Bank of Scotland Group, PLC, Greenwich Capital Holdings, Inc., Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc., DBA RBS Greenwich Capital and others
Public Employees' Retirement S v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
as 12-614
Petitioner: Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company, GS Mortgage Securities Corp. and others
Respondent: Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi, Individually, on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Moody's Investors Service, Inc., Fitch Inc. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-4676
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
New Jersey Carpenters Vacation v. HarborView Mortgage Loan Trust
as 11-1684
Plaintiff - Appellant: Boilermaker Blacksmith National Pension Trust and New Jersey Carpenters Vacation Fund, On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant: HarborView Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-4, HarborView Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-5, HarborView Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-9 and others
Defendant - Appellee: The Royal Bank of Scotland Group, PLC, Greenwich Capital Holdings, Inc., Greenwich Capital Acceptance, Inc and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?