Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 31 - 40 of 216
United States of America v. Gonzales
as 19-31
Defendant / Appellant: Winifredo Gonzales, AKA Fred, AKA Chin
Undetermined: United States of America
United States of America v. Viola
as 18-849
Appellee USA: United States of America
Defendant: Fred Rosen, AKA Rosie, Gerard Petrozelli, AKA Tony, AKA Rosie, Jr., AKA Rosie Petrozelli, Jr., Barry Imhoff, AKA Number 15, Jr., AKA Rosie, Jr., AKA Rosie Imhoff, Jr. and others
Defendant - Appellant: Anthony Viola
Kaplan v. S.A.C. Capital Advisors, L.P.
as 17-4144
Plaintiff: Roxy D. Sullivan, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Lindsey Rankin, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: David E. Kaplan, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Michael S. Allen, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Chi-Pin Hsu, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and others
Defendant: S.A.C. Capital Advisors, L.P., S.A.C. Capital Advisors, Inc., CR Intrinsic Investors, LLC and others
Appellant: Reed Smith LLP
Kaplan v. S.A.C. Capital Advisors, L.P.
as 17-4067
Plaintiff: Roxy D. Sullivan, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Lindsey Rankin, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Michael S. Allen, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Chi-Pin Hsu, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Fred M. Ross and others
Defendant: S.A.C. Capital Advisors, L.P., S.A.C. Capital Advisors, Inc., CR Intrinsic Investors, LLC and others
Appellant: Reed Smith LLP
Latouche v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage Inc.
as 17-4003
Plaintiff - Appellant: Michelle Latouche
Defendant - Appellee: Wells Fargo Home Mortgage Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Asef Mortgage Capital and others
In Re: Eliquis (Apixaban)
as 17-3867
Plaintiff: Michael Sneed, Janet Sneed, Judy Brooks, as proposed Administratrix of the Estate of Donald Brooks, deceased and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Glenda Miller, John Paul, Carol A. Jones, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Lellen Leroy Jones, deceased and others
Defendant - Appellee: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Pfizer Inc. and McKesson Corporation
Defendant: Does, inclusive 1-100
In re: Eliquis (Apixaban) Prod v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
as 17-3750
Plaintiff: Michael Sneed, Janet Sneed, Judy Brooks, as proposed Administratrix of the Estate of Donald Brooks, deceased and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Graciela Parks
Defendant - Appellee: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Pfizer Inc. and McKesson Corporation
Defendant: Does, inclusive 1-100
In re: Eliquis (Apixaban) Prod v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
as 17-3750
Plaintiff: Michael Sneed, Janet Sneed, Judy Brooks, as proposed Administratrix of the Estate of Donald Brooks, deceased and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Graciela Parks
Defendant / Appellee: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Pfizer, Inc.
Defendant: Does, inclusive 1-100 and McKesson Corporation
In Re: Eliquis (Burbank)
as 17-3708
Plaintiff: Michael Sneed, Janet Sneed, Judy Brooks, as proposed Administratrix of the Estate of Donald Brooks, deceased and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Burt Burbank
Defendant - Appellee: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Pfizer Inc. and McKesson Corporation
Defendant: Does, inclusive 1-100
In re: Eliquis (Apixaban) Prod
as 17-3767
Plaintiff: Michael Sneed, Janet Sneed, Judy Brooks, as proposed Administratrix of the Estate of Donald Brooks, deceased and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Sheree Brown, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Norma Lee Gordon, deceased
Defendant - Appellee: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Pfizer Inc. and McKesson Corporation
Defendant: Does, inclusive 1-100

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?