Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,225
Catherine McKoy, Marcus Frazier and Lynn Chadwick v. The Trump Corporation and Donald J. Trump
as 24-241
Plaintiff: JANE DOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LUKE LOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, RICHARD ROE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant / Appellee: THE TRUMP CORPORATION, DONALD TRUMP, in his personal capacity, DONALD TRUMP, JR. and others
Catherine McKoy, Marcus Frazier and Lynn Chadwick v. The Trump Corporation and Donald J. Trump
as 24-180
Plaintiff: JANE DOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LUKE LOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, RICHARD ROE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: LYNN CHADWICK, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,, MARKUS FRAZIER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and CATHERINE MCKOY, Individually
Defendant / Appellee: THE TRUMP CORPORATION, DONALD TRUMP, in his personal capacity, DONALD TRUMP, JR. and others
Intervenor: RAJ K. PATEL
Catherine McKoy, Marcus Frazier and Lynn Chadwick v. The Trump Corporation and Donald J. Trump
as 24-181
Plaintiff: JANE DOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LUKE LOE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, RICHARD ROE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant / Appellee: THE TRUMP CORPORATION, DONALD TRUMP, in his personal capacity, DONALD TRUMP, JR. and others
Atas v. The New York Times Company
as 24-58
Defendant / Appellee: NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, DEAN BAQUET, ELLEN POLLOCK and others
Defendant / Appellant: NADIRE ATAS
Fredricks v. Sergeant John Doe
as 24-9
Plaintiff / Appellant: NIGEL FREDRICKS
Defendant / Appellee: Sergeant JOHN DOE, Correctional Officer JANE DOE, Mental Health Dr . JANE DOE and others
Allen v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
as 24-30
Plaintiff / Appellee: PETER ALLEN, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, BRIAN BERNARD, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, MARK DANIELS, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff: SPENCER JACKSON, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, MICHAEL VATTIATO, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and EDDIE FIELDS, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated
Defendant: NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, CARL KOENIGSMANN, MD, JOHN MORLEY, MD and others
Defendant / Appellant: CAROL MOORES, DR.
Clark v. State of Connecticut
as 23-8105
Plaintiff / Appellant: GORDON CLARK, -, in his individual capacity, in his capacities as husband, sole fiduciary, sole beneficiary, and sole creditor of the Estate of Lillian J. Clark
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF CONNECTICUT, Office of Governor NED LAMONT, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Miller Rich v. Altum Pharmaceuticals Inc.
as 23-8101
Plaintiff / Appellant: NANCY MILLERRICH
Defendant / Appellee: ALTUM PHARMACEUTICALS INC., BETTERLIFE PHARMA INC., AHMAD DOROUDIAN and others
Defendant: JOHN AND JANE DOES 150, ABC CORPORATIONS 120, KRISZTIAN TOTH and others
Mikanda v. City of Poughkeepsie Police Department
as 23-7995
Plaintiff / Appellant: NEYEMBO MIKANDA
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF POUGHKEEPSIE POLICE DEPARTMENT, GULF OIL INTERNATIONAL and JANE DOE
Orrego v. Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano LLP
as 23-7928
Plaintiff / Appellant: LIDIA M. ORREGO, -
Defendant / Appellee: PASTERNACK TILKER ZIEGLER WALSH STANTON & ROMANO LLP, PASTERNACK TILKER WEITZ & LUXENBERG LLP, FIRST CHOICE EVALUATIONS LLC and others
Defendant: JOHN DOE and JANE DOE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?