Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 240
Johnson v. Rodeway Inn Syracuse
as 22-1774
Petitioner: Robert W. Johnson
Respondent: Rodeway Inn Syracuse, Pro Se Corporation, Choice Hotels International Inc., Pro Se Corporation, Commissioner Teresa Gaffney, Pro Se Govt. Employee and others
Salvatore v. Airbus Group HQ, Inc.
as 22-1603
Plaintiff / Appellant: AmySue Salvatore and Michael F. Salvatore
Defendant / Appellee: Airbus Americas, Inc. and Airbus S.A.S.
Defendant: Airbus Americas Engineering, Inc., Airbus SE and AVSA S.A.R.L.
Johnson v. Rodeway Inn Syracuse
as 22-1489
Petitioner: Robert W. Johnson
Respondent: Rodeway Inn Syracuse, Pro Se Corporation, Choice Hotels International Inc., Pro Se Corporation, Commissioner Teresa Gaffney, Pro Se Govt. Employee and others
In re: Treasury Securities Auc We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-943
Plaintiff: Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, Beaver County Employees' Retirement Fund, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Marc Federighi, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: Michael St. John, BNP Paribas Securities Corp., Bank of Nova Scotia, New York Agency and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: City of Pontiac Police and Fire Retirement System, On behalf of itself and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Health and Welfare Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: BMO Capital Markets Corp., CIBC World Markets Corp., Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-838
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bille v. Coverall North America, Inc.
as 22-718
Plaintiff / Appellee: Caribe Bille, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated individuals and Quincy Reeves, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated individuals
Defendant / Appellant: Coverall North America, Inc.
Elliott v. Cartagena We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-255
Plaintiff / Appellant: Eric A. Elliott, AKA Fly Havana
Defendant / Appellee: Joseph Anthony Cartagena, AKA Fat Joe, Karim Kharbouch, AKA French Montana, Shandel Green, AKA Infared and others
Defendant: Kobalt Songs Music Publishing, Kobalt Music Publishing America, Inc., Reach Global Inc. and others
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-159
Plaintiff / Appellee: James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant: AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner: FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
United States of America ex re v. Grifols USA, LLC
as 22-107
Plaintiff: ABC
Plaintiff / Appellant: United States of America ex rel. Allen Timothy Yu
Defendant / Appellee: Grifols USA, LLC, Grifols Shared Services North America, Inc., FKA Grifols, Inc., Grifols, S.A and others
Defendant: DEF, Grifols, Inc. and Grifols Biologicals, Inc.
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-19
Plaintiff / Appellee: James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant: AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner: FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?