Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 64
New York State Rifle and Pisto v. Cuomo
as 14-37
Defendant: Frank A. Sedita, III, District Attorney for Erie County, Gerald J. Gill, Chief of Police for the Town of Lancaster, New York and Lawrence Friedman
Amicus Curiae: State of Kentucky, Law Enforcement Action Network, Empire State Arms Collectors Association, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: William Nojay, Blueline Tactical & Police Supply, LLC, Sportsmen's Association for Firearms Education, Inc. and others
Petitioner: Second Amendment Foundation, Inc., John Amidon, Reuel A. Todd, Oswego County Sheriff and others
Defendant / Appellant: Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of the State of New York, Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor of the State of New York and Joseph A. D'Amico, Superintendent of the New York State Police
New York State Rifle and Pisto v. Cuomo
as 14-36
Amicus Curiae: John Amidon, State of Delaware, State of Kentucky and others
Defendant: Frank A. Sedita, III, District Attorney for Erie County
Defendant / Appellee: Gerald J. Gill, Chief of Police for the Town of Lancaster, New York, Lawrence Friedman, Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor of the State of New York and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Sportsmen's Association for Firearms Education, Inc., Batavia Marine & Sporting Supply, Thomas Galvin and others
Petitioner: Donald B. Smith, Putnam County Sheriff, Timothy B. Howard, Erie County Sheriff, Barry C. Virts, Wayne County Sheriff and others
United States of America, ex r v. Amgen Inc.
as 13-4102
Plaintiff: State of California, State of Delaware, State of Florida and others
Movant - Appellant: Joseph Piacentile and Kevin Kilcoyne
Defendant - Appellee: Amgen Inc., U.S. Oncology, Inc., Amerisource Bergen Corp. and others
Appellee: United States of America, Ex Relator Joseph Piacentile and Kevin B. Kilcoyne
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2889
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Giaraputo v. Xerox Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-1658
Plaintiff: Helene Giaraputo, Ind obo all other similarly situated, Seymour Lazar, Ind &o/b/o all othere similarly situated, Thomas Zambito and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Thomas Dalberth, IBEW Local 164 Welfare Fund, Robert W. Roten and others
Defendant - Appellee: Xerox Corporation, Barry Romeril, Paul A. Allaire and others
Hauck v. Advance Auto Parts Inc.
as 13-1425
Plaintiff - Appellee: Phyliss Hauck
Defendant: Advance Auto Parts Inc., Air &Liquid Systems Corporation, AKA Buffalo Pumps Inc., Armstrong International Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant: Crane Co.
Hauck v. Advance Auto Parts Inc.
as 13-1425
Plaintiff / Appellee: Phyliss Hauck
Defendant: Advance Auto Parts Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, AKA Buffalo Pumps Inc., Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellant: Crane Co.
Kennedy v. England
as 13-946
Plaintiff - Appellant: Joseph F. Kennedy
Defendant - Appellee: England, France, Germany and others
Anderson v. Nationwide Credit, Inc.
as 12-2421
Plaintiff - Appellee: Kristin Anderson, an individual, Jonathan Supler, an individual, Kevin Tumulty, an individual, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Movant - Appellant: Susan Fox and Farobag Cooper
Defendant - Appellee: Nationwide Credit, Inc., a Georgia Corporation and John and Jane Does, Numbers 1 through 25
Grand River Enterprises Six Na v. Pryor
as 12-840
Plaintiff - Appellant: Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Limited
Defendant - Appellee: Troy King, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, and is sued herein solely in his official, representative capacity, Talis Colberg, Attorney General of the State of Alaska, and is sued herein solely, in his official, representative capacity, Terry Goddard, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, and is sued herein solely in his official, representative capacity and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?