Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 51 - 60 of 352
Garcia v. Decker
as 21-1109
Respondent / Appellee: Thomas Decker, Director, New York Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Sheriff Carl E. Dubois, Sheriff, Orange County, Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Attorney General and others
Petitioner / Appellant: Mario Rene Garcia
Madej Manchanda v. Lewis
as 21-1088
Defendant / Appellee: Susan Quintana, New York USCIS Field Office Director, Does 1-5, Andrea Lewis, Immigration Services Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Rahul Manchanda and Sylwia Ewelina Madej Manchanda
Defendant: Immigration Services Officer Lewis
Saleh v. Pastore
as 21-1073
Defendant / Appellee: Gina Pastore, as Brooklyn Field Office Director U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice, Lee Bowes, as Acting Field Office Director, Northeast Region, USCIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Tarek Youssef Hassan Saleh
Onosamba-Ohindo v. Garland
as 21-1044
Defendant: Matthew Albence, in his official capacity as Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Robert M. Wilkinson, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the Department of Justice, Executive Office For Immigration Review and others
Defendant / Appellee: Jeffrey Searls, in his official capacity as the Acting Administrator of the Buffalo Federal Detention Facility
Plaintiff: Antonio Lopez Agustin, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff / Appellant: Junior Onosamba-Ohindo, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Teran Rivera v. Searls
as 21-1035
Respondent / Appellee: Thomas Feeley, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, Buffalo Field Office, U.S. Customs Enforcement, Merrick B. Garland, in his official capacity as Attorney General, of the United States, Jeffrey Searls, in his official capacity as Facility Director, Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, NY and others
Petitioner / Appellant: Roberto Carlos Teran Rivera
P.L. v. U.S. Immigration and Customs E
as 21-825
Plaintiff: J.C., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Plaintiff / Appellant: R.F.J., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, P.L., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, A.Q., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: Director Thomas R. Decker, Director of New York Field Office of ICE, in official capacity, Director Matthew Albence, Director Matthew T. Albence Executive Associate Director of ICE Enforcement Removal Operations, in official capacity, Daniel J. Daugherty and others
Concepcion v. Garland
as 21-658
Respondent: Kevin McAleenan, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Thomas Feeley, Field Office Director for Detention and Removal, William P. Barr, United States Attorney General and others
Petitioner: Danilo Concepcion
Salis v. Mayorkas
as 21-590
Plaintiff / Appellant: Owolabi Salis
Defendant / Appellee: Kevin McAleenan and Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security
Van Stuyvesant v. Barr
as 21-583
Defendant / Appellee: Francis Cassina, Director United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary United States Department of Homeland Security, Christopher Wrey, Director Federal Bureau of Investigation Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Curtis Van Stuyvesant, United States ex. rel
Gonzalez Evangelista v. Decker
as 21-599
Respondent: Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Merrick B. Garland, United States Attorney General, Thomas Decker, Director, New York Field Office of U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner: Juan F. Gonzalez Evangelista

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?