Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 71 - 80 of 352
Nazer v. United States of America
as 20-4021
Defendant / Appellee: Federal Bureau of Investigation, Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Izzat Nazer
Hernandez-Aviles v. Decker
as 20-3995
Petitioner: Noe Hernandez-Aviles
Respondent: Attorney General William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Thomas v. Barr
as 20-4029
Respondent: Thomas Brophy, Facility Director Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, Thomas E. Feeley, Field Office Director for Detention and Removal, Buffalo Field Office, Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States and others
Petitioner: Harvel Thomas
Martinez Roman v. Decker
as 20-3974
Respondent: Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement and William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice
Petitioner: Marco Antonio Martinez Roman
Rodriguez v. Barr
as 20-3917
Respondent: Michael Ball, SDDO, Mr. William P. Barr, United States Attorney General, Mr. Thomas Feeley, Field Office Director for Detention Removal and others
Petitioner: Olvin Geovany Rodriguez
Knight First Amendment Institu v. United States Department of Ho We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-3837
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Customs and Border Protection and United States Department of Justice
Plaintiff / Appellee: Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University
Defendant / Appellant: United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and United States Department of State
Rodriguez v. Decker
as 20-3735
Respondent: Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement and William P. Barr
Petitioner: Marvin Nolasco Rodriguez
Onosamba-Ohindo v. Barr
as 20-3712
Defendant / Appellant: Jeffrey Searls, in his official capacity as the Acting Administrator of the Buffalo Federal Detention Facility
Defendant: Matthew Albence, in his official capacity as Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Executive Office For Immigration Review, James McHenry, in his official capacity as the Director of the Executive Office for Immigration and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Antonio Lopez Agustin, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and Junior Onosamba-Ohindo, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
American Steamship Owners Mutu v. United States of America
as 20-3655
Defendant / Appellee: United States Coast Guard National Pollution Funds Center, United States Attorney, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection and Indemnity Association, Inc., as Subrogee of Boston Marine Transport, Inc.
Bernal Gutierrez v. Decker
as 20-3531
Respondent: Director Thomas Decker, New York Field Office of U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, Carl E. Du Bois, Sheriff of Orange County, Chad F. Wolf, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner: Juan Edgar Bernal Gutierrez

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?