Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Catholdi-Janowski v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
as 24-1010
Plaintiff:
MARYSUSAN CATHOLDI-JANOWSKI
Defendant:
CVS PHARMACY, INC., a Rhode Island Corporation and CVS HEALTH CORPORATION, a Rhode Island Corporation
Leonard v. United States of America
as 24-64
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAVERNE M. LEONARD
Defendant / Appellee:
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IRVING MEDICAL CENTER, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, COLLEN RICHARD and others
Leonard v. United States of America
as 23-8018
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAVERNE M. LEONARD
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Biden Administration, President JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., U.S. PRESIDENT, AKA Joseph A. Biden, AKA Joseph Robinette Biden, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-418
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company, KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc, UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Albertsons Companies, Inc., H-E-B L.P., The Kroger Co. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-410
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-420
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company, KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc, Albertsons Companies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund, Teamsters Western Region & Local 177 Health Care Plan, Fraternal Order Of Police Miami Lodge 20, Insurance Trust Fund and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re: In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-423
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund, Teamsters Western Region & Local 177 Health Care Plan, Fraternal Order Of Police Miami Lodge 20, Insurance Trust Fund and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company and KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
Mai v. New York State Office of Temporary and Disability
as 23-23
Petitioner:
Hong Mai
Respondent:
New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, New York State Department of Health, New York City Department of Health and others
Mai v. The New York State Office of T
as 22-915
Petitioner:
Hong Mai
Respondent:
CVS Pharmacy at 338 East 23rd Street, NYC 10010, The New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, The New York State Department of Health and others
In Re: American Express Anti-S
as 20-1766
Plaintiff:
National Supermarkets Association, Inc., on behalf of its membership, and all other similarly situated persons, Clam Lake Partners LLC, James Eaton and others
Intervenor:
Gander Mountain Company, Circuit City Liquidating Trust, Holiday Companies and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Qwik Lube LLC and LaJolla Auto Tech, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
American Express Company and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc,
Defendant:
Susan Burdette
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
