Cases 1 - 10 of 2,131
Rabin v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
as 24-2971
Defendant:
UNITED STATES NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION, and NSF Director Dr. Sethuraman Panchanathan, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, and DOEdu Secretary Dr. Miguel Cardona, HHS OFFICE FOR HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTIONS, and OHRP Acting Director Julie Kaneshiro, all officials are in their official capacity and others
Plaintiff:
PETER D. ROSENHOLM, J. CHAD VANDERGRIFF, LISA R. WALLER and others
Wispe v. Toulon, Jr.
as 24-2926
Defendant:
ERROL D. TOULON, JR., Suffolk County Sheriff
Plaintiff:
HERNAN WISPE
Torres v. Boyer
as 24-2958
Plaintiff:
HIRAM TORRES
Defendant:
EF CORPORATION, doing business as West Motor Freight of PA, EVANS DELIVERY COMPANY INC. and WESTLEY D. BOYER, JR.
:
ANDREW DOWD
Watson v. Wilhelm
as 24-2942
Defendant:
AVIGAIL ROSENBERG, Program Director, ALYSSA WRINKLE, Program Director, ABU B. SIDDICK, Badge #17235 and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WILLIAM WATSON, JR.
Mendoza v. Edge
as 24-2859
Defendant:
Warden H. TELLEZ, Metropolitan Detention Center, JOHN DOE #3, Warden D. EDGE and others
Plaintiff:
RUDY MENDOZA
Mausner v. Mausner
as 24-2842
Plaintiff:
IRENA K. MAUSNER, individually and as trustee of the Irena K. Mausner Revocable Trust U/A/D May 16, 2022
Defendant:
IAN O. MAUSNER
United States of America v. Hampton
as 24-2805
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DANIELLE D. HAMPTON
Checksfield v. Internal Revenue Service
as 24-2786
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Plaintiff:
KEVIN D. CHECKSFIELD
United States of America v. Conley (John VanHoesen)
as 24-2692
Defendant:
JOHN WELCOME, TARON ROBINSON, SHABAR PERKINS and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
K. K. v. New York City Department of Education
as 24-2655
Plaintiff:
K. K., individually and on behalf of M.K., a child with a disability and D. K., individually and on behalf of M.K., a child with a disability
Defendant:
NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.