Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Rimini v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.
as 24-757
Plaintiff: THOMAS RIMINI
Defendant: JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
Salese v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.
as 24-589
Plaintiff: MICHAEL J. SALESE
Defendant: JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
The City of Philadelphia v. Bank of America Corporation
as 24-297
Plaintiff / Appellee: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS and MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE
Defendant: GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC., JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., WELLS FARGO & CO. and others
Defendant / Appellant: BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., BANC OF AMERICA SECURITIES LLC and others
Tera Group, Inc. v. Citigroup, Inc.
as 24-135
Plaintiff / Appellant: TERA GROUP, INC., TERA ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and TERAEXCHANGE, LLC
Defendant / Appellee: CITIGROUP, INC., CITIBANK, N.A., CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC. and others
Defendant: BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED and others
Public School Teachers Pension and Retirement Fund of Chicago v. Bank of America Corporation
as 24-81
Petitioner: PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS PENSION AND RETIREMENT FUND OF CHICAGO, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and LOS ANGELES COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION
Respondent: BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED and others
Palladino v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.
as 23-1031
Plaintiff / Appellant: John Palladino, Garib Karapetyan, Steve Palladino and others
Defendant / Appellee: JPMorgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., Bank of America Corporation and others
In Re Mexican Government Bonds Antitrust Litigatio
as 22-2039
Plaintiff / Appellant: Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement System, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, Electrical Workers Pension Fund Local 103, I.B.E.W., on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, Government Employees' Retirement System of the Virgin Islands, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: Banco Santander, S.A., Santander Investment Securities Inc., Santander Holdings USA, Inc. and others
Defendant: John Does 1-10
City of Providence, Rhode v. Bats Global Markets, Inc.
as 22-920
Plaintiff: Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund, Forsta AP-fonden, StateBoston Retirement System and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: City of Providence, Rhode Island, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Employees' Retirement System of the Government of the Virgin Islands, United Association National Pension Fund and others
Defendant: Wedbush Securities, Inc., Tradework Inc., Bids Trading, L.P. and others
Defendant / Appellee: Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc., Direct Edge ECN, L.L.C., The Nasdaq Stock Market L.L.C. and others
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-159
Plaintiff / Appellee: James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant: AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner: FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-19
Plaintiff / Appellee: James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant: AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner: FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?