Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Collinsville Police Pension Board on behalf of the Collinsville Police Pension Fund v. Discovery, Inc.
as 24-646
Plaintiff:
OHIO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF OHIO, COLLINSVILLE POLICE PENSION BOARD ON BEHALF OF THE COLLINSVILLE POLICE PENSION FUND, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and others
Defendant:
DISCOVERY, INC., WARNER BROS. DISCOVERY, INC., DAVID ZASLAV and others
Barclay v. Dixon
as 24-92
Defendant / Appellee:
MAKAYLA COOK, Police Officer, Sandusky Police Department, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Makayla Cook, TIM MCCONAHAY, Warden, Mansfield Correctional Facility, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Tim Mcconahay, ROBERT A. DIXON, Attorney, Attorney at Law, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Robert A. Dixon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LESHAWN MAURICE BARCLAY, a Moor beneficiary, a Emperor, Admiral, Mariner, Merchant, Piloter a private Moor aboriginal ohioan national, and subject of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire
Johnson v. Richland County Jail
as 22-1572
Petitioner:
Robert W. Johnson
Respondent:
Richland County Jail, Christopher Blunk, James Myers and others
Federal Trade Commission v. Vyera Pharmaceuticals, LLC
as 22-728
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Federal Trade Commission, State of New York, State of California and others
Defendant:
Vyera Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Phoenixus AG and Kevin Mulleady, individually, as an owner and director of Phoenixus AG and as a former executive of Vyera Pharmaceuticals, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
Martin Shkreli, individually, as an owner and former director of Phoenixus AG and as a former executive of Vyera Pharmaceuticals, LLC
Rye Ridge Corp. v. The Cincinnati Insurance Compa
as 21-1323
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rye Ridge Corp., a New York corporation, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, DBA Rye Ridge Deli and Haromar, Inc., a Connecticut corporation, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, DBA Rye Ridge Deli
Defendant / Appellee:
Cincinnati Insurance Company, an Ohio corporation
Amicus Curiae:
Restaurant Law Center, New York State Restaurant Association and New York City Hospitality Alliance
In Re: Petrobras Securities
as 19-3531
Defendant:
Petrobras Global Finance B.V., BB Securities Ltd., Banco Bradesco BBI S.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Forsta AP-fonden, Aberdeen International Equity Fund, Louis Kennedy, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Appellant:
William Thomas Haynes, as Trustee for the benefit of W Thomas and Katherine Haynes Irrevocable Trust for the benefit of Sara L Haynes
Plaintiff / Appellee:
North Carolina Department of State Treasurer, Universities Superannuation Scheme Limited and Employees Retirement System of the State of Hawaii
McCormick v. HUD
as 20-400
Defendant / Appellee:
Jane Does 1-1000, inclusive, Historic Pastures Village Apartments, Albany, New York, a business entity, et al., Olde Franklin School Apartments, Schenectady, New York, a business entity, et al. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jo Anna Canzoneri McCormick
Johnson v. Cuomo
as 19-4062
Defendant / Appellee:
Nationwide, Daphne, Alabama 36256, Linda A. Lacewell, Superintendent and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert W. Johnson
In Re: Petrobras Securities
as 18-2324
Plaintiff:
Aura Capital Ltd., Dimensional Emerging Markets Value Fund, DFA Investment Dimensions Group Inc., on behalf of its series Emerging Markets Core Equity Portfolio and others
Appellant:
Pomerantz LLP
Defendant / Appellee:
Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. Petrobras, BB Securities Ltd., Theodore Marshall Helms and others
Defendant:
Mariangela Mointeiro Tizatto, Josue Christiano Gome Da Silva, Daniel Lima De Oliveira and others
Appellee:
Mathis B. Bishop, Catherine O. Bishop, Joseph Gielata and others
Ohio Casualty Ins. Co. v. Twin City Fire Insurance Compa
as 19-2338
Defendant / Appellee:
Twin City Fire Insurance Company
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ohio Casualty Insurance Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
