Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Zappia v. Myovant Sciences Ltd.
as 24-253
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOSEPH ZAPPIA, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant / Appellee: MYOVANT SCIENCES LTD., MYOVANT SCIENCES, INC., SUMITOMO PHARMA AMERICA, INC. and others
Miller Rich v. Altum Pharmaceuticals Inc.
as 23-8101
Plaintiff / Appellant: NANCY MILLERRICH
Defendant / Appellee: ALTUM PHARMACEUTICALS INC., BETTERLIFE PHARMA INC., AHMAD DOROUDIAN and others
Defendant: JOHN AND JANE DOES 150, ABC CORPORATIONS 120, KRISZTIAN TOTH and others
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-418
Debtor: In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff: J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company, KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc, UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Albertsons Companies, Inc., H-E-B L.P., The Kroger Co. and others
Defendant / Appellee: Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-410
Debtor: In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant: CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp. and others
Defendant / Appellee: Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-420
Debtor: In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff: J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company, KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc, Albertsons Companies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund, Teamsters Western Region & Local 177 Health Care Plan, Fraternal Order Of Police Miami Lodge 20, Insurance Trust Fund and others
Defendant / Appellee: Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re: In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-423
Debtor: In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff: UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund, Teamsters Western Region & Local 177 Health Care Plan, Fraternal Order Of Police Miami Lodge 20, Insurance Trust Fund and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company and KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc
Defendant / Appellee: Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc v. Novartis Pharma AG
as 22-427
Plaintiff / Appellant: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee: Novartis Pharma AG, Novartis Technology LLC, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and others
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-97
Petitioner: The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Purdue Pharma L.P., et al. and Ad Hoc Group of Individual Victims of Purdue Pharma, L.P.
Respondent: The State of Washington, The District of Columbia, The City of Grande Prairie, as Representative Plaintiff for a Class Consisting of All Canadian Municipalities, the Cities of Brantford, Grand Prairie, Lethbridge, and Wetaskiwin and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-116
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-85
Petitioner: The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Purdue Pharma L.P., et al., Purdue Pharma, L. P., Purdue Pharma Inc and others
Respondent: The State of Washington, State of Maryland, District of Columbia and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?