Cases 1 - 10 of 51
McGrady v. Montgomery County, Maryland
as 24-1491
Plaintiff:
DUANE MCGRADY
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND, STATE OF MARYLAND, MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF and others
United States of America v. U.S. Oncology, Inc.
as 23-1334
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel. Omni Healthcare, State of California, ex rel. Omni Healthcare, State of Colorado, ex rel. Omni Healthcare and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Omni Healthcare Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. Oncology, Inc.
United States of America v. McKesson Corporation
as 23-726
Plaintiff:
ABC, United States of America, ex rel, State of California, ex rel and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Adam Hart
Defendant / Appellee:
McKesson Corporation, McKesson Specialty Distribution LLC, Collectively and McKesson Specialty Care Distrobution Corportaion, Collectively, DBA McKesson Specialty Health
Defendant:
DEF and McKesson Specialty Care Distribution JV LLC, FKA McKesson Specialty Care Distribution Joint Venture LP
Pilat v. Amedisys, Inc.
as 23-566
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Pilat, Relator, United States of America, State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware, State of Florida, State of Georgia, State of Illinois, State of Indiana, State of Louisiana, State of Maryland, State o and Philip Maniscalco, Relator, United States of America, State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware, State of Florida, State of Georgia, State of Illinois, State of Indiana, State of Louisiana, State of Maryland, Sta
Defendant / Appellee:
Amadisys, Inc., Does 1-100 and Amedisys, Inc.
National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc. v. James
as 22-1374
Plaintiff / Appellant:
National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc., Beretta U.S.A. Corp., Davidson's, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Letitia James, in her official capacity as New York Attorney General
Amicus Curiae:
Montana, National Rifle Association of America, City of New York and others
Petitioner:
Ryan Bussee
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-88
Petitioner:
Multi-State Governmental Entities Group
Respondent:
State of California, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware and others
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-96
Petitioner:
Mortimer-Side Initial Covered Sackler Persons
Respondent:
State of California, People of the State of California, by and through Attorney General Rob Bonta, State of Connecticut and others
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-90
Petitioner:
Ad Hoc Committee of Governmental and Other Contingent Litigation Claimants
Respondent:
State of California, People of the State of California, by and through Attorney General Rob Bonta, State of Connecticut and others
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-97
Petitioner:
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Purdue Pharma L.P., et al. and Ad Hoc Group of Individual Victims of Purdue Pharma, L.P.
Respondent:
The State of Washington, The District of Columbia, The City of Grande Prairie, as Representative Plaintiff for a Class Consisting of All Canadian Municipalities, the Cities of Brantford, Grand Prairie, Lethbridge, and Wetaskiwin and others
In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 22-94
Petitioner:
The Raymond Sackler Family and Raymond Sackler Family/Side B of the Sackler Family
Respondent:
The State of Washington, State of Maryland, District of Columbia and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
