Cases 41 - 50 of 635
Trithorn Bulk A/S v. Duron Capital LLC
as 1:2022cv09628
Petitioner:
Trithorn Bulk A/S
Respondent:
Duron Capital LLC
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
AGCS Marine Insurance Company et al v. M/V IMABARI LOGGER et al
as 1:2022cv09283
Plaintiff:
AGCS Marine Insurance Company and Weatherford Artificial Lift Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Danmar Lines Ltd., Danmar Lines AG doing business as Danmar Lines Ltd., Danzas Corporation doing business as Danmar Lines Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30704 Liability of Water Carriers - Loading, stowage, custody, care, and delivery
Tappan Zee Constructors, LLC v. Miller Marine, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08661
Plaintiff:
Tappan Zee Constructors, LLC
Defendant:
Miller Marine, Inc. and Miller's Launch, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30304 Breach of Maritime Contract - liability of noncompliance
Maersk Line A/S v. World Cargo Solutions LLC
as 1:2022cv08525
Plaintiff:
MAERSK LINE A/S
Counter Claimant:
WORLD CARGO SOLUTIONS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 mc Marine Contract
Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company Of America, et al v. M/V One Apus, et al
as 1:2022cv08233
Plaintiff:
Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company Of America,, Affliated FM Insurance Company, Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty and others
Defendant:
One, BDP Transport Inc., HMM and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Danmar Lines
Cross Claimant:
Transpac Cargoline, New Chain Logistics Co Ltd, Samsung SDS Co Ltd and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
M/V ONE APUS, IMO no. 9806079, including its engines, boilers, tackle, and other appurtenances, etc., in rem
Cross Defendant:
Roes 1-10
3Rd Party Defendant:
Orient Overseas Container Line, M/V One Apus in rem, ECU Worldwide and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30701 Marine Cargo Loss or Damage - Liability of Water Carriers
The Tokio Marine and Fire Insurance Co. (HK) Ltd. v. Eagle Logistic Service Inc.
as 1:2022cv08237
Plaintiff:
The Tokio Marine and Fire Insurance Co. (HK) Ltd.
Defendant:
Eagle Logistic Service Inc.
Trustee:
JESSICA SHIP HOLDING S.A.
3Rd Party Defendant:
M/V One Apus, in rem, CHIDORI SHIP HOLDING LLC, NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30701 Marine Cargo Loss or Damage - Liability of Water Carriers
UPS Asia Group Pte. Ltd. et al v. Shenzhen Eva Mould Manufacturing Company Limited et al
as 1:2022cv08115
Plaintiff:
UPS Asia Group Pte. Ltd., UPS Ocean Freight Services, Inc. and UPS SCS (China) Ltd.
Defendant:
Shenzhen Eva Mould Manufacturing Company Limited, The Chamberlain Group Limited, Freig Carillo Forwarding and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30701 Marine Cargo Loss or Damage - Liability of Water Carriers
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07943
Plaintiff:
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
Defendant:
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc., AIT Worldwide Logistics, Inc. and C.H. Robinson International, Inc.
4Th Party Defendant:
M/V One Apus, in rem, CHIDORI SHIP HOLDING LLC, JESSICA SHIP HOLDING S.A. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd. and Hapag Lloyd Aktiengesellchaft, Hamburg
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MSIG Mingtai Insurance Company, Ltd. v. M/V One Apus et al
as 1:2022cv07368
Plaintiff:
MSIG Mingtai Insurance Company, Ltd.
Defendant:
M/V One Apus, Starlink Freight System (SFO) Inc., Apex Maritime Co., Inc. doing business as Apex Shipping Co. and others
Cross Claimant:
Apex Maritime Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported (DISCONTINUED AFTER 1/27/2014)
National Specialty Ins Co. v. Get Reel Charters, Ltd
as 1:2022cv07311
Petitioner:
National Specialty Insurance Co. and National Specialty Ins Co.
Respondent:
Get Reel Charters, Ltd and Get Reel Fishing Charters, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 dj Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
