Cases 61 - 70 of 89
Levy v. Chase Bank
as 1:2013cv00950
Plaintiff:
Amanda U. Levy
Defendant:
Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv08181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03994
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Capurso v. Bank & Banking et al
as 1:2012cv02698
Plaintiff:
Victor Frederick Leo Capurso
Defendant:
Bank & Banking, U.S., Corporations, Offering Products & Services, to consumers, at all named of Banks & Holding, Companies, Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Justice For All v. County Executive, County Clerk, Notary Clerks of Putnam County, State of New York et al
as 1:2012cv00155
Plaintiff:
Justice For All
Defendant:
County Executive, County Clerk, Notary Clerks of Putnam County, State of New York, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Employees of JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Norman v. Caretakers of the Constitution et al
as 1:2011cv06831
Defendant:
Caretakers of the Constitution, The United States Government, Colleet Corbin and others
Plaintiff:
Dawn Norman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03715
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
