Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06810
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Sterling v. ACS (Administration for Children Services) et al
as 1:2024cv05936
Defendant:
ACS (Administration for Children Services), HRA (Human Resources Administration), City of New York and others
Plaintiff:
Rose Sterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ag Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv10192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gewirtzman et al v. Chofetz Chaim Inc. et al
as 7:2021cv04560
Defendant:
Chofetz Chaim Inc., Sterling National Bank, Samuel Markowitz and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Gewirtzman and Avrohom Gottheil
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 8705
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schwartz v. Sterling Entertainment Enterprises, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01084
Defendant:
SportsNet New York and Sterling Entertainment Enterprises, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jonas Schwartz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.