Cases 11 - 20 of 131
Azor-El et al v. New York City Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv03650
Defendant:
New York City Department of Corrections, City of New York, Warden Kisa Smalls and others
Plaintiff:
Ramon Gomez, Ronnie Cole, James Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rush v. Annucci et al
as 1:2020cv01165
Defendant:
Donnelly, Jane (Cindy) Doe, Anthony Bertonica and others
Plaintiff:
Basheen Rush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rush v. Annucci et al
as 1:2019cv11830
Defendant:
K. Vasile, Jane Doe (Cindy), John or Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Basheen Rush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. United States of America
as 7:2019cv09629
Plaintiff:
Clydedoro Graham
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Pizarro v. United States of America et al
as 1:2019cv06991
Defendant:
Christian McNeal, Hector Pagan, Matthew Noftsier and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Pizarro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ayala-Rosario v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2019cv03052
Defendant:
Leandro Diaz, Graham, Westchester County and others
Plaintiff:
Tamir Ayala-Rosario
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lombardo v. Graham et al
as 1:2019cv02024
Defendant:
Jane Doe and Harold D. Graham
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lombardo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Ridge et al
as 1:2018cv09493
Defendant:
Mr. Peter T. Ridge, Mr. Micheal T. Ridge, Tamiko Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Carlington Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cameron-Graham v. City Of New York , et al
as 1:2018cv08906
Defendant:
Supervisor C.O. John/Jane Doe # 1-2, Warden John/Jane Doe # 1, C.O. John/Jane Does #1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Cindra Cameron-Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2018cv08889
Defendant:
The Chief Administrator, Arresting Officer 887282, Arresting Officer 674007 and others
Plaintiff:
Echo Westley Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
