Cases 1 - 10 of 251
Song v. Virgil
as 1:2024cv03820
Plaintiff:
Eugenia Song
Defendant:
Scott Virgil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Groder et al
as 1:2024cv03858
Plaintiff:
Holmes Alexander
Defendant:
Jeffery Scott Groder and Dzurenda E. James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Commonwealth of Pennyslvania
as 1:2023cv10902
Petitioner:
Tonia Scott
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennyslvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mullings v. Finley
as 1:2023cv09603
Petitioner:
Kyle Mullings and Kyle T. Mullings
Respondent:
Scott Finley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rivera v. McNamara et al
as 1:2023cv09530
Plaintiff:
Hector Rivera
Defendant:
Attorney Connor McNamara, Attorney Scott Midden, Robert Tsigler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Orange County et al
as 7:2023cv08211
Plaintiff:
Paul Smith
Defendant:
Orange County, Carl E. DuBois, Orange County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francely v. State of Florida et al
as 1:2023cv07666
Plaintiff:
Trent Francely
Defendant:
State of Florida, John Doe, Katherine Fernandez Rundle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruggiero v. Jones et al
as 7:2023cv07157
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ruggiero
Defendant:
Stefanie E. Jones, Kevin C. Eschmann, Paul E. Julien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Annucci et al
as 1:2023cv06911
Plaintiff:
Clayton Scott
Defendant:
Commissioner Anthony Annucci, Sergeant Joseph and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Annucci et al
as 1:2023cv06921
Plaintiff:
James Scott
Defendant:
Commissioner Anthony Annucci, Sergeant Joseph and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
