Cases 101 - 110 of 244
Burns v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv06328
Plaintiff:
David Burns
Defendant:
City of New York and Dept. of Corr. Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hedgeye Risk Management LLC v. Bank of Montreal et al
as 1:2016cv04842
Plaintiff:
Hedgeye Risk Management LLC
Defendant:
Bank of Montreal, BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc. and Joel Jackson
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01927
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Burns v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 7:2016cv00963
Plaintiff:
Brandie Burns
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Pharma AG and Bayer Oy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00826
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
Burns v. Griffin et al
as 1:2016cv00782
Plaintiff:
Trevor Burns
Defendant:
Thomas Griffin, Michael T Nagy, Mark A. Tokarz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry v. Hulse Jr. et al
as 1:2016cv00252
Plaintiff:
Joseph Terry
Defendant:
CO James Hulse Jr., CO Matthews Burns, CO Chad Esterbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns et al v. Jacobs-Toney
as 1:2015cv08925
Plaintiff:
George Walter Burns III and Sheila Diggs Utts
Defendant:
Jade Janelle Jacobs-Toney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 au Diversity-Auto Negligence
Burns v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv07946
Defendant:
Buffalo Pumps Inc. , Viacom, Inc. Successor by Merger to CBS Corporation, fka Westinghouse Electric Corporation, General Electric Company and others
Plaintiff:
William W. Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
