Cases 31 - 40 of 117
Ortiz v. Westchester County Jail et al
as 1:2018cv05344
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ortiz
Defendant:
Westchester County Jail, Correct Care Solutions, LLC, New York Correct Care Solutions Medical Services P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. Correct Care Solution et al
as 1:2018cv04311
Plaintiff:
Rafael Torres
Defendant:
Correct Care Solution and Kulesza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barragan v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2018cv04321
Plaintiff:
Jerson Barragan
Defendant:
Westchester County, Global TEL-Link/AdvancePay Services, Aramark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. Correct Care Solution et al
as 1:2018cv04247
Plaintiff:
Rafael Torres
Defendant:
Correct Care Solution and Kulesza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carzoglio v. Abrams et al
as 1:2018cv04198
Plaintiff:
Angelo A. Carzoglio
Defendant:
Thomas Abrams, Karl Vollmer, Middleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2018cv04163
Plaintiff:
Jorge Perez
Defendant:
Westchester County, Global Tel-Link/Advance Pay Services, Aramark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2018cv04086
Plaintiff:
Bruce Lewis
Defendant:
Westchester County, Global Tel-Link, Aramark Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mercedes v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2018cv04087
Plaintiff:
Leibys Mercedes
Defendant:
Westchester County, Global Tel-Link, Advance Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2018cv03370
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Kitson Andrew Turner
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Raul Ulloa, Joon Park and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goode v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2018cv02963
Plaintiff:
La'Sean Goode
Defendant:
Westchester County, Correct Care Solutions, Joon Parke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
