Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Schneiderman v. Evans Bancorp, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00726
Plaintiff:
Eric T. Schneiderman
Defendant:
Evans Bancorp, Inc. and Evans Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pinto et al v. Town of Evans et al
as 1:2014cv00719
Plaintiff:
Paul S. Pinto and Michael J. Meadows
Defendant:
Town of Evans and Officer Matthew Stonitsch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carmel v. CSH&C et al
as 6:2014cv06385
Plaintiff:
Wanda J Carmel
Defendant:
CSH&C, VAMC, St. Joseph's Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Capellupo v. Webster Central School District et al
as 6:2013cv06481
Plaintiff:
Michelle Capellupo
Defendant:
Webster Central School District and David Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burroughs v. Bobo et al
as 1:2011cv00471
Plaintiff:
Lorcen Burroughs
Defendant:
Bobo, J. Keller, J. Magyar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
P.P., Individually et al v. Evans-Brant Central School District
as 1:2009cv00922
Plaintiff:
P.P., Individually, P.P., Individually, P.P., Individually and others
Defendant:
Evans-Brant Central School District
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
P.M. v. Evans-Brant Central School District
as 1:2009cv00686
Plaintiff:
P.M., P.M. and P.M.
Defendant:
Evans-Brant Central School District
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2008cv06536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
P.M. et al v. Evans-Brant Central School District
as 1:2008cv00168
Plaintiff:
P.M. and J.M.
Defendant:
Evans-Brant Central School District
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Warney v. The City of Rochester et al
as 6:2007cv06246
Plaintiff:
Douglas Warney, Douglas Warney and Douglas Warney
Defendant:
The City of Rochester, Monroe County, Sandra Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
