Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Pool Deals, LLC v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00047
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Pool Deals, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hendrix v. UPS United Parcel Services et al
as 6:2016cv06723
Plaintiff:
Walter J. Hendrix
Defendant:
UPS United Parcel Services, Scott Davis, C.E.O, UPS Regional Manager and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv06031
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cordovani et al v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters et al
as 6:2013cv06367
Plaintiff:
Jonathan R. Cordovani and Edward J. Thurston
Defendant:
International Brotherhood of Teamsters , International Brotherhood of Teamsters-Local Union No. 118 and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv06591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Greco v. United Parcel Service
as 6:2009cv06627
Plaintiff:
Anthony S. Greco
Defendant:
United Parcel Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Swan v. United Parcel Service
as 6:2009cv06249
Plaintiff:
David G. Swan
Defendant:
United Parcel Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2007mc00076
Petitioner:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Respondent:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
