Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Vivanco Barrientos De Allcca v. Garland
as 24-1231
Petitioner:
SONIA ERIKA VIVANCO BARRIENTOS DE ALLCCA, ABRAHAM EUGENIO ALLCCA VIVANCO and BENEDICTO EUGENIO ALLCCA VEGA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Zhiguisaca-Guaman v. Garland
as 24-631
Petitioner:
LUIS HUMBERTO ZHIGUISACA-GUAMAN, MARIA ALVAREZ-GUAMAN, DIANA ELIZABETH ZHIGUISACA-ALVAREZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Toapanta Ochoa v. Garland
as 24-456
Petitioner:
JEFFERSON JHONNY TOAPANTA OCHOA, ERIKA TATIANA ACAN GUAMUNSHI and KEYNER ISAAC TOAPANTA ACAN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Caguana-Ilbay v. Garland
as 23-7970
Petitioner:
ERIKA MARLENE CAGUANA-ILBAY and IKER SEBASTIAN COLCHA-CAGUANA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Loja-Cajamarca v. Garland
as 23-7845
Petitioner:
JONNATHAN MANUEL LOJA-CAJAMARCA, ERIKA JACQUELINE DUCHIMAZA-PAUTA and JOSUE DAVID LOJA-DUCHIMAZA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Collaguazo Guamancela v. Garland
as 23-7756
Petitioner:
JUAN SANTIAGO COLLAGUAZO GUAMANCELA, ERIKA ANDREA ROCANO SUCUZHANAY and CARLOS AARON COLLAGUAZO ROCANO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Carew v. Momentive Global, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03774
Plaintiff:
Renaldo Carew
Defendant:
Momentive Global, Inc., Lauren Antonoff, Susan L. Decker and others
Wang v. Momentive Global Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03408
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Momentive Global Inc., Lauren Antonoff, Susan L. Decker and others
O'Dell v. Momentive Global Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03360
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Momentive Global Inc., Lauren Antonoff, Susan L. Decker and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
