Cases 1 - 10 of 186
United States of America v. Jackson (Hunter)
as 24-1772
Defendant:
JEROME HUNTER, SYDNEY JACKSON, JOHN KING and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 v. Biden
as 24-1713
Plaintiff:
PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE NUMBER P60005535, Ronald Satish Emrit and PRESIDENTIAL COMMITTEE/POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE/SEPARATE SEGREGATED FUND (SSF) NUMBER C00569897
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, President, HUNTER BIDEN, UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE and others
Stoddard v. City of Hartford
as 24-1654
Plaintiff:
MISSY STODDARD
Defendant:
CITY OF HARTFORD, JARRETT HUNTER, ADAM DEMAINE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04440
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Hunter (Samia)
as 24-1553
Defendant:
ADAM SAMIA, JOSEPH MANUEL HUNTER, MICHAEL FILTER and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hunter et al v. Azentio Software Private Limited
as 1:2024cv03728
Respondent:
Azentio Software Private Limited
Petitioner:
Vivek Sethia and Ashley Hunter
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 201 Enforcement of Convention
Hunter v. Debmar-Mercury LLC.
as 24-1229
Plaintiff:
KELVIN HUNTER
Defendant:
DEBMAR-MERCURY LLC., IRA BERNSTEIN, MORT MARCUS and others
Amicus Curiae:
SOCIETY FOR HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sposato v. Ryan
as 24-536
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SPOSATO
Defendant:
MATTHEW W. RYAN, individually and in his official capacity, PAUL G. CAREY, -, individually and in his official capacity, JED HUDSON, individually and in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
