Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Carlisle v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 7:2015cv01376
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Carlisle
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Teamsters Local 687
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Gonzalez v. United Parcel Service Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv08421
Plaintiff:
Elias Gonzalez
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc., United Parcel Service Co. and United Parcel Service General Services Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Petrocelli v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01343
Defendant:
Matthew Hoffman, Joseph Reimo, United Parcel Service General Services Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Petrocelli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Cordovani et al v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters et al
as 6:2013cv06367
Plaintiff:
Jonathan R. Cordovani and Edward J. Thurston
Defendant:
International Brotherhood of Teamsters , International Brotherhood of Teamsters-Local Union No. 118 and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Dennis v. United Parcel Service Inc.
as 1:2012cv04881
Plaintiff:
Clive Dennis
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Humphrey v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2010cv05122
Plaintiff:
Maxwell Humphrey
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Dugan et al v. The UPS Health Care Package et al
as 5:2010cv01151
Plaintiff:
James Dugan and David Sansone
Defendant:
The UPS Health Care Package, United Parcel Service, Inc. and United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Henry v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 2:2007cv02577
Plaintiff:
Gary Henry
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., United Parcel Service, Inc. and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
