Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Finco Prime Consulting Corporation v. Belmamoun
as 23-298
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Finco Prime Consulting Corporation, SweetPea Ventures, Inc., MJT Park Investors, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Omar Belmamoun
Defendant:
Brookstone Partners Morocco S.A.
Rooney et al v. Prospect Capital Management L.P. et al
as 1:2023cv01753
Defendant:
Prospect Floating Rate And Alternative Income Fund Inc. (formerly known as Prospect Flexible Income Fund, Inc. formerly known as TP Flexible Income Fund, Inc. formerly known as Triton Pacific Investme, Prospect Capital Management L.P., Prospect Flexible Income Fund, Inc. formerly known as TP Flexible Income Fund, Inc. formerly known as Triton Pacific Investme and others
Plaintiff:
Cathy Rooney As Trustee For Dianne F. Schubel Trust, Doris Wall IRA, Michael Faigen IRA, on behalf of nominal defendant Triton Pacific Advisors, Inc. and others
Nominal Defendant:
Triton Pacific Advisers LLC, n/k/a Prospect Flexible Income Management LLC and Triton Pacific Advisers LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Stanley Rubenstein v. Linda L. Adamany
as 22-2794
Plaintiff:
ABC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Stanley Rubenstein, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant JEFFERIES FINANCIAL GROUP INC.,
Defendant / Appellee:
Linda L. Adamany, Barry J. Alperin, Robert D. Beyer and others
Defendant:
DEF and Jeffreies
Peters, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant Eastman Kodak Company v. Continenza et al
as 6:2021cv06621
Plaintiff:
LOUIS PETERS, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY and Louis Peters
Defendant:
JAMES V. CONTINENZA, DAVID E. BULLWINKLE, ROGER W. BYRD and others
Petitioner:
Herbert Silverberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Braxton v.Unknown Defendant
as 1:2018cv07221
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Braxton
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Kitzen v. Hancock et al
as 2:2017cv02966
Defendant:
Pisa Contracting Inc., Blue Gate Consulting Corp., HCD Construction Management and Planning Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Ira Kitzen and Ira Kitzen individually, and on behalf of Pisa Contracting, Inc. d/b/a Hancock Contracting & Design, and on behalf of Enterprise Holdings, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Chen v. New Trend Apparel, Inc.
as 12-5101
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant:
Lifeng Chen, holder of at lest fifty percent of outstanding shares of New Trend Apparel, Inc., Sunning Eagle Holdings Limited, Zhejiang Datang Import & Export Co. Ltd. and others
Appellant:
New York Clothing Group, Incorporated, Proposed Defendant New York Clothing Group, Inc. and Nina Chang, Proposed Defendant Nina Change
Defendant-Counter-Claimant:
New Trend Apparel, Inc.
Defendant:
Kisum Louie, AKA Tommy K. Louie, John Doe, fictitiously named parties, true name(s) unknown, Jane Doe, fictitiously named parties, true name(s) unknown and others
Appellee:
Hana Financial, Inc.
Strickland v. Hongjun et al
as 11-3235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Judith Strickland, derivately on behalf of nominal defendant China North East Petroleum Holdings Limited
Defendant - Appellee:
Wang Hongjun, Yu Liguo, Robert C. Bruce and others
Stein v. Immelt et al
as 11-2236
Plaintiff:
Olga Lerner, Plaintiff In Related Case 10-CIV -1807 (RH)
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Albert Stein, Derivatively o/b/o Nominal Defendant General Electric
Defendant:
Bracket B. Denniston, Pamela Daley, Kathryn A. Cassidy and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Jeffrey R. Immelt, Keith S. Sherin, James I. Cash, Jr. and others
In re Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc
as 11-1285
Plaintiff - Appellant:
N.A. Lambrecht, Derivately on behalf of Nominal Defendant Bank of America Corporation, and Double Derivately on behalf of Nominal Defendant Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Brian T. Moynihan and Joseph L. Price
Defendant - Appellee:
Stanley O'Neal, Ahmass L. Fakahany, Gregory J. Fleming and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
