Cases 1 - 10 of 159
7-Eleven, Inc. et al v. Visa Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv05746
Petitioner:
The Gymboree Corporation, The Children's Place Retail Stores, Inc., Thornton's Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Marathon Petroleum Company LP, Priceline.com, LLC, National RailRoad Passenger Corporation and others
Respondent:
Mastercard Incorporated, Wells Fargo & Company, Citigroup Inc and others
Interested Party:
Cardtronics USA, Inc. and John Hancock Life Insurance Company (USA)
Material Witne:
Verifone, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Transform SR Holdings LLC and Elgin Ave. Recovery, LLC
Defendant:
Citicorp Credit Services, Inc. (USA)
Special Master:
James Orenstein
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The City of Philadelphia v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv01608
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Wachovia Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
The City of Philadelphia, City of Philadelphia and San Diego Association of Governments
Consolidated Defendant:
Fifth Third Securities, Inc., BMO Financial Corp., BMO Financial Group and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Palladino v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.
as 23-1031
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Palladino, Garib Karapetyan, Steve Palladino and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JPMorgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., Bank of America Corporation and others
Pizzabov, Inc. et. al. v. Visa International Service Association et. al.
as 2:2020cv01517
Defendant:
Capital One Bank, (USA), N.A., Bank of America Corp., Visa International Service Assocation and others
Plaintiff:
1SaleADay, Octagon Commerce, LLC, East New York Kosler, Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
National Association of Convenience Stores et al v. Visa U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2005cv04521
Special Master:
James Orenstein
Plaintiff:
National Association of Convenience Stores, National Association of Chain Drug Stores, National Community Pharmacists Association and others
Defendant:
Visa U.S.A., Inc., Visa International Service Association, Mastercard Incorporated and others
Amicus Curiae:
U.S. Public Research Interest Group
Not Classified By Court:
1001 Property Solutions LLC, Temple Eagle Partners LLC, Fiesta Restaurant Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Amcore Bank, N.A., et al v. Bank of America Corporation, et al
as 1:2014cv01757
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Markets Ltd., Portigon AG, Bank of America Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, The Berkshire Bank, Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Vladimir Sklarov
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
BBA Trent Ltd. (F.K.A. BBA LIBOR, Ltd.), NatWest Markets plc (F.K.A. The Royal Bank of Scotland plc), COPERATIEVE RABOBANK UA (F.K.A. COPERATIEVE CENTRALE RAIFFEISEN-BOERENLEENBANK, B.A.) and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 FDIC: Corporate Powers
In re Foreign Exchange Benchmark Rates Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2013cv07789
Not Classified By Court:
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Keith Kornell, Gregory Galan and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Nasser Bakizada, Robert Charles Class A, L.P., Jeffrey Sterk and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Citibank N.A., Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., Credit Suisse Group AP and others
Defendant:
Settling Defendants, Morgan Stanley & Co. International plc, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Donna S. Lucas, Neil Taylor, Doris Sue Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Rives, Robert Miller, Casey Sterk and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
HSBC Bank plc, HSBC Bank USA, N.A., HSBC North America Holdings, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Fresno County Employees Retirement Association
Consolidated Counter Defendant:
BNP Paribas North America, Inc.
Claimant:
FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD), Forex Capital Markets, LLC, Lucid Markets LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Palladino et al v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al
as 1:2023cv01215
Plaintiff:
John Palladino, Garib Karapetyan, Steve Palladino and others
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., Bank of America Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
In re: Treasury Securities Auc
as 22-943
Plaintiff:
Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, Beaver County Employees' Retirement Fund, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Marc Federighi, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael St. John, BNP Paribas Securities Corp., Bank of Nova Scotia, New York Agency and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
City of Pontiac Police and Fire Retirement System, On behalf of itself and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Health and Welfare Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
BMO Capital Markets Corp., CIBC World Markets Corp., Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. and others
In Re Mexican Government Bonds Antitrust Litigatio
as 22-2039
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement System, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, Electrical Workers Pension Fund Local 103, I.B.E.W., on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, Government Employees' Retirement System of the Virgin Islands, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Banco Santander, S.A., Santander Investment Securities Inc., Santander Holdings USA, Inc. and others
Defendant:
John Does 1-10
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
