Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Purcell et al v. Continental Aktiengesellschaft et al
as 1:2024cv00938
Plaintiff:
Daniel Purcell, Luke Cuddy and Elizabeth Twitchell
Defendant:
Continental Aktiengesellschaft, Continental Tire The Americas, LLC, Compagnie Generale Des Etablissements and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Borozny et al. v. RTX Corporation, Pratt & Whitney Division, et al
as 3:2021cv01657
Plaintiff:
David Granata, James Rowe, Stephen Dowe and others
Defendant:
Pratt & Whitney, a Division of Raytheon Technologies Corporation, QuEST Global Services-NA, Inc., Belcan Engineering Group, LLC and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Tom Conroy, Christopher Novoa, Scott Prentiss and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Belcan LLC, Co-Conspirator, Does 1-50 and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Staffing Association
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
In Re: Auction Houses Anti., et al v. , et al
as 1:2000cv00648
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Robert A. Daly, Jr., Ronald Black, Vicki Haberman and others
Claimant:
N.B.S. Diamonds, Inc., Seymour Stein, Louis Glick Diamond Corp. d/b/a Louis Glick & Co. and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Sotheby's Inc., Christopher M. Davidge, Abraham & Associates and others
Defendant:
Fataihi Company of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, A. Alfred Taubman, Swicorp, S.A. and others
Interested Party:
United States Of America and The United States of America
Intervenor Plaintiff:
J&J Lubrano, Giovanna Terruzzi, Pamela Alper and others
Petitioner:
Boies, Schiller & Flexner, L.L.P.
Plaintiff:
Herbert Black
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Kintz v. Agilis Engineering, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01674
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kintz
Defendant:
Agilis Engineering, Inc., Belcan Engineering Group, LLC, Cyient, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Conroy et al v. Agilis Engineering, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01659
Plaintiff:
Tom Conroy, Daniel Sartoris, Christopher Novoa and others
Defendant:
Agilis Engineering, Inc., Belcan Engineering Group, LLC, Cyient, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Reale v. Google LLC et al
as 3:2021cv01412
Plaintiff:
Daniel Reale
Defendant:
Google, LLC, YouTube, LLC and Alphabet, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Allen v. Dairy Farmers of America, Inc.
as 19-179
Plaintiff:
Richard Swantak, Garret Sitts, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Vince Neville, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Claudia Haar, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Robert Fulper, Reynard Hunt and others
Defendant:
Dairy Marketing Services, LLC, Dairy Farmers of America, Inc., HP Hood LLC and others
Appellant:
Daniel Smith and Richard Thomas Cassidy
Intervenor:
Stephen H. Taylor and Darrel J. Aubertine
Excellus Health Plan v. Tran, et al
as 1:2003cv00095
Plaintiff:
Excellus Health Plan, Inc. doing business as Univera Healthcare, .
Defendant:
Daniel T. Tran, M.D. Kathleen Mylotte, D.O. Michael J. Edbauer and others
Trustee:
Bankruptcy Trustee Mark S. Wallach, Esq.
Petitioner:
Independent Health Association, Inc. and Individual Practice Association of Western New York, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Meyer v. Kalanick
as 16-2752
Plaintiff:
Spencer Meyer, Individually and on behalf of those similarly situated
Counter Claimant:
Uber Technologies, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Ergo
Defendant / Appellant:
Travis Kalanick
Amicus Curiae:
The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Internet Association, Consumer Technology Association and others
Meyer v. Kalanick
as 16-2750
Plaintiff:
Spencer Meyer, Individually and on behalf of those similarly situated
Counter Claimant:
Uber Technologies, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Ergo
Defendant / Appellant:
Travis Kalanick
Amicus Curiae:
The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Internet Association, Consumer Technology Association and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
