Antitrust Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 30
D'Onofrio General Contractors Corp. v. Sika AG et al
as 1:2024cv03255
Plaintiff: D'Onofrio General Contractors Corp
Defendant: Sika AG, Sika Corporation, Chryso, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 sc Sherman-Clayton Act
D'Onofrio General Contractors Corp. v. Sika AG et al
as 1:2024cv00783
Plaintiff: D'Onofrio General Contractors Corp.
Defendant: Sika AG, Sika Corporation, Chryso, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
In Re Mexican Government Bonds Antitrust Litigatio
as 22-2039
Plaintiff / Appellant: Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement System, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, Electrical Workers Pension Fund Local 103, I.B.E.W., on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, Government Employees' Retirement System of the Virgin Islands, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: Banco Santander, S.A., Santander Investment Securities Inc., Santander Holdings USA, Inc. and others
Defendant: John Does 1-10
Government Employees' Retirement System of the Virgin Islands v. Banco Santander S.A. et al
as 1:2018cv04673
Plaintiff: Government Employees' Retirement System of the Virgin Islands
Defendant: Banco Santander S.A., Santander Investment Securities, Inc., Santander Holdings USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Banco Santander S.A. et al
as 1:2018cv04400
Plaintiff: Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
Defendant: Banco Santander S.A., Santander Investment Securities, Inc., Santander Holdings USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Boston Retirement System v. Banco Santander S.A. et al
as 1:2018cv04294
Defendant: Banco Santander S.A., Santander Investment Securities, Inc., Santander Holdings USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Boston Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority Pension Plan et al v. Banco Santander S.A. et al
as 1:2018cv03985
Defendant: Banco Santander S.A., Santander Investment Securities, Inc., Banco Santander (Mexico) S.A. Institucion De Banca Multiple, Grupo Financiero and others
Plaintiff: Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority Pension Plan and Metropolitan Transportation Authority Defined Benefit Pension Plan Master Trust
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 14
IN RE MEXICAN GOVERNMENT BONDS ANTITRUST LITIGATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv02830
Defendant: Citigroup Global Markets Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement System and Electrical Workers Pension Fund Local 103, I.B.E.W.
Consolidated Plaintiff: Boston Retirement System, United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-State Pension Fund, Government Employees' Retirement System of the Virgin Islands and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
In re: Aluminum Warehousing An
as 16-4305
Plaintiff - Appellant: Claridge Products and Equipment, Incorporated, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Custom Aluminum Products Incoroprated, Ampal Incorporated and others
Defendant - Appellee: Metro International Trade Services, L.L.C., Pacorini Metals USA, LLC, Henry Bath LLC and others
Defendant: John Does 1-10, Does 1-10, inclusive, Unidentified Parties and others
Eastman Kodak Company v. Goldman Sachs Group We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-4230
Plaintiff - Appellant: Eastman Kodak Company, AGFA Corporation, AGFA Graphics NV and others
Defendant - Appellee: Henry Bath LLC, Metro International Trade Services, L.L.C., JP Morgan Chase & Co. and others
Defendant: Pacorini Metals AG, London Metal Exchange Limited, London Metal Exchange Limited and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?