Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Reeves v. City of New York Office of the Public Advocate
as 1:2011cv08523
Plaintiff:
Anthony H. Reeves
Defendant:
City of New York Office of the Public Advocate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
M.K.B. v. Eggleston
as 11-4526
Plaintiff - Appellee:
M.K.B., on their own behalf, and on behalf of their minor children and all others similarly situated, O.P., on their own behalf, and on behalf of their minor children and all others similarly situated, L.W., on their own behalf, and on behalf of their minor children and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Verna Eggleston, as Commissioner of the New York City Human Resources Administration, Elizabeth R. Berlin, as Executive Deputy Commissioner of the New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance and Nirav R. Shah, as Commissioner of the New York, State Department of Health
Shakhnes v. Eggleston
as 11-2003
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Boris Shakhnes, by his next friend Alla Shakhnes, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, by his next friend Mikhail Feldman, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, by his next friend Fei Mock, individually and o
Defendant:
Verna Eggleston, Commissioner, of the New York City Human Resources Administration
Defendant - Appellant:
Nirav R. Shah, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health and Elizabeth R. Berlin, Executive Deputy Commissioner of the New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance
Spencer v. Doar et al
as 1:2009cv04737
Plaintiff:
John Spencer
Defendant:
Robert Doar, New York City Human Resources Administration, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abreu et al v. Mattingly et al
as 1:2008cv00535
Plaintiff:
Jamie Abreu and Christiana Garrison
Defendant:
John B. Mattingly and Administration for Children's Services of the City of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
