Cases 61 - 70 of 18,878
Torres v. Titus
as 6:2024cv06305
Petitioner:
Jose L. Torres
Respondent:
Superintendent A. Titus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bennings et al v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00877
Petitioner:
Antonio Bennings and Addison Bennings
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campbell v. Guadarama
as 3:2024cv00578
Petitioner:
Colin Campbell
Respondent:
Jesus Guadarama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
McCargo v. Jamison
as 1:2024cv02280
Petitioner:
Kareem McCargo
Respondent:
Warden Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Awuley v. Ball
as 6:2024cv06189
Petitioner:
Prince Awuley
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls and Michael Ball
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nazer v. Manhattan District Attorney et al
as 1:2024cv02713
Petitioner:
Izzat Nazer
Respondent:
Manhattan District Attorney and Warden at Rikers Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yung v. NYC Mayor Adams et al
as 1:2024cv02948
Petitioner:
John Yung
Respondent:
NYC Mayor Adams, Warden of OBCC Rikers Island of NYC and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
DeFreitas v. Toulon Jr.
as 2:2024cv03394
Petitioner:
Russell DeFreitas
Respondent:
Errol D. Toulon Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mosby v. Miller
as 6:2024cv06291
Petitioner:
Marcus Mosby
Respondent:
Supt. Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clavijo v. Wolcott
as 6:2024cv06288
Petitioner:
Joel Clavijo
Respondent:
Julie Wolcott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
