Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Galladay v. Carter
as 1:2023cv00823
Petitioner:
Kevin Galladay
Respondent:
Warden Mrs. Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Carter
as 1:2022cv10705
Petitioner:
Willie Scott
Respondent:
Warden Mrs. Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McNeil v. Warden Carter
as 1:2022cv07360
Petitioner:
Babu McNeil
Respondent:
Warden Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Annucci et al
as 1:2022cv09019
Petitioner:
David Carter
Respondent:
Anthony Annucci and Leticia James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2022cv03087
Petitioner:
Aaron James Carter
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Bronx Residential Re-Entry Center (GEO), Grand Prairie Sentence Computation Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Carter v. Annucci et al
as 1:2022cv02789
Petitioner:
David Carter
Respondent:
Anthony Annucci and Leticia James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Walker et al
as 1:2022cv00993
Petitioner:
Rafael Arden Jones
Respondent:
Sharlisa Walker and John Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. Carter
as 22-147
Petitioner / Appellant:
Rafael Arden Jones, Sr. and Rafael Arden Jones, Sr., AKA Rafael Arden Jones
Respondent:
Jane Carter
Respondent / Appellee:
Sharlisa Walker
Jones v. Carter
as 1:2021cv09571
Petitioner:
Rafael Arclen Jones, Sr. and Rafael Arden Jones, Sr.
Respondent:
"Jane" Carter
Defendant:
Sharlisa Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carter v. Miller
as 1:2021cv02680
Petitioner:
Elliott Carter
Respondent:
Christopher Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
