Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Jimenez v. Jane/John Doe
as 1:2024cv04281
Petitioner:
Pedro Jimenez
Respondent:
Jane/John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
John Doe v. NYC Dept. of Corrections
as 1:2024cv01139
Petitioner:
John Doe
Respondent:
NYC Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wiggins v. Stover et al
as 3:2023cv00842
Petitioner:
LaMar Wiggins
Respondent:
Rick Stover, John Doe and Colette S. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Conlin v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv03272
Petitioner:
Mr. Jeremy Lee Conlin, John Doe and Texas Doe
Respondent:
United States of America and United States Marshals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bonilla v. Jane/John Doe
as 1:2022cv02075
Petitioner:
Danny J. Bonilla
Respondent:
Jane/John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Dunbar et al
as 1:2021cv06036
Plaintiff:
Rafael Arden Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Sherma Dunbar and John Doe or Jane Doe Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McCarthy v. Doe et al
as 3:2021cv00749
Petitioner:
John J. McCarthy
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McCarthy v. Doe
as 3:2021cv00191
Petitioner:
John J. McCarthy
Respondent:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Doe v. Cook et al
as 3:2020cv00718
Respondent:
Rollin Cook and Kenneth Butricks
Petitioner:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Collier et al v. John Doe II
as 1:2020cv02183
Respondent:
William Zerillo, The Geo Group, Inc., Ralph Sozio and others
Petitioner:
Marquis Collier, John Doe II, John Doe III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
