Cases 1 - 10 of 188
Scott v. Commonwealth of Pennyslvania
as 1:2023cv10902
Petitioner:
Tonia Scott
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennyslvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mullings v. Finley
as 1:2023cv09603
Petitioner:
Kyle Mullings and Kyle T. Mullings
Respondent:
Scott Finley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Miller v. Uhler
as 9:2023cv01079
Petitioner:
Scott Miller
Respondent:
Donald Uhler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Capra
as 7:2023cv03923
Petitioner:
Damon Scott
Respondent:
Michael Capra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kanayama v. Kowal
as 1:2023cv03469
Petitioner:
Masahide Kanayama
Respondent:
Chief US PreTrial Sv Scott Kowal, Scott Kowal and Does 1-10
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
and Does 1-10
Interested Party:
Attorney David Marshall Dudley and Co-Chief, Money Laun Tara LaMorte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Scott v. Carter
as 1:2022cv10705
Petitioner:
Willie Scott
Respondent:
Warden Mrs. Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Byrd v. Livingston County Jail
as 6:2022cv06422
Plaintiff:
Justin Adam Byrd
Defendant:
Livingston County Jail, Zach Scott, Deputy Fennell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Danforth
as 9:2022cv01039
Petitioner:
Scott Miller
Respondent:
S. Danforth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Lowe et al
as 1:2022cv07710
Petitioner:
Keeba Scott Harris
Respondent:
Craig Lowe and Raymond Tonkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Scott v. Lowe et al
as 1:2022cv07697
Petitioner:
Tonia Scott
Respondent:
Craig Lowe and Raymond Tonkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
