Cases 81 - 90 of 20,282
Johnson v. Department of Corrections
as 6:2024cv06332
Plaintiff:
Dion Johnson
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Govan v. The State of New York
as 1:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Kwauhuru Govan
Defendant:
The State of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ogle v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00516
Plaintiff:
John Ogle
Defendant:
Dr. John Doe, Surgeon John Doe and Daniel F. Matruscello, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Kortright et al
as 9:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
James Miller
Defendant:
L. Kortright, L. Lilly and G. Jergdi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Janczuk v. USA et al
as 1:2024cv03655
Plaintiff:
Weronika Janczuk
Defendant:
USA and USA-SDNY Probation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Browne v. Zebro et al
as 1:2024cv02781
Plaintiff:
Kendall Browne
Defendant:
P.O. James J. Zebro, P.O. Mark P. Shackel, P.O. Anthony P. Guidice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wallace v. Dinello et al
as 9:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Wallace
Defendant:
David Dinello, Venkata Mannava, Shazia Chaudhry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kroemer v. County of Ontario, New York State
as 6:2024cv06323
Plaintiff:
Kent A. Kroemer, .
Defendant:
County of Ontario, New York State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henton v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv02270
Plaintiff:
Naji-Ullah Henton
Defendant:
The City of New York, Officer Granston Gabrielle, Officer Saint Jean Johanne and others
Respondent:
The New York City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Katz et al
as 1:2024cv03266
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Hill
Defendant:
Melinda Katz, Jacob Saks, Police Officer Crociata Stefano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
