Cases 1 - 10 of 130
Ramos v. Shearman et al
as 6:2024cv06325
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ramos
Defendant:
Tina Shearman, Sarah Shearman, Racquel M. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Jorge Ramos
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer John Doe #1, Police Officer John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramos v. Fordham
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Juan Ramos
Defendant:
Ms. Anne L. Fordham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Doe et al
as 1:2023cv01323
Plaintiff:
Juan Ramos
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quince et al v. Ramos
as 1:2023cv08185
Plaintiff:
Laisohn J Quince
Defendant:
Jorge Ramos, Mohammad Abdelfattah and NYPD PSA 3 Precinct
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wolterstorff v. Quiros et al
as 3:2023cv01111
Plaintiff:
Robert Munro Wolterstorff III and Robert Munro Wolterstorff, III
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Guadarrama, McKenzie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Federal Government
as 1:2023cv05559
Plaintiff:
Glenn MacPherson Thomas
Defendant:
Federal Government, Edgardo Ramos, Jeremy Gutman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Federal Government et al
as 1:2023cv04666
Plaintiff:
Glenn MacPherson Thomas
Defendant:
Federal Government, Judge Edgardo Ramos and Michael H. Sporn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Velasco v. Vaughan-Williams et al
as 3:2023cv00419
Plaintiff:
Victor Velasco
Defendant:
Vaughan-Williams, Losty, Hayer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv02464
Plaintiff:
David Ramos
Defendant:
City of New York, John Does 1-5 and Jane Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
