Civil Rights Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Knight v. New York State Department of C
as 22-964
Plaintiff / Appellee: Hugh Knight, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and Shannon Dickinson, on behalf of themselves and all otehrs similarly situated
Plaintiff: Wayne Stewart, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant: New York State Department of Corrections, a public entity, Carl Koenigsmann, MD, Susan Mueller, MD and others
Defendant / Appellant: Chung Lee, MD and Albert Acrish, NP
Barrett v. Maciol
as 22-200
Plaintiff / Appellee: Nicole Williamson, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Sarah Barrett, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and Shannon Terrell, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant: Robert Maciol, Oneida County Sheriff and Lisa Zurek, Chief Deputy Oneida County Jail
West v. DOCCS
as 18-578
Plaintiff: Abdul M. Shariff and Divine C. Allah, on their behalf and all other similarly situated
Plaintiff - Appellant: James M. West
Defendant - Appellee: Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
Defendant: Glenn S. Goord, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, Stephan Bernardi, Deputy Commissioner, of Policy & Compliance, of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, Thomas Poole, Supt. of Five Points Corr. Fac., of N.Y. State Department of Correctional Services and others
Lackwood v. Stanford
as 17-2217
Plaintiff - Appellant: Mark Lackwood, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: Tina Stanford, Individually and as Chairperson of the New York State Board of Parole, G. Hallerdin, individually and as members of the New York State Board of Parole, S. Thompson, individually and as members of the New York State Board of Parole and others
Medina v. Napoli
as 13-131
Plaintiff: Troy Brooks, Charles Brown, Michael Doxen and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Anthony Medina
Defendant - Appellee: David F. Napoli, Superintendent, Angela A. Bartlett, Deputy Superintendent, Marilyn Bridge, Deputy Superintendent and others
Medina v. Napoli
as 12-4558
Plaintiff: Troy Brooks, Charles Brown, Michael Doxen and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Anthony Medina
Defendant - Appellee: David F. Napoli, Superintendent, Angela A. Bartlett, Deputy Superintendent, Marilyn Bridge, Deputy Superintendent and others
Smith v. New York State Department of C
as 11-3526
Plaintiff - Appellant: Jimmy Smith, suing on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and Anthony Palumbo, suing on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: New York State Department of Correctional Services and Brian Fischer, Commissioner Department of Correctional Services
Graziano v. Pataki We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-116
Plaintiff - Appellant: Peter Graziano, suing on behalf of himself and all others similary situated, James Buckley, suing on behalf of himself and all others similary situated, Mark Malone, suing on behalf of himself and all others similary situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: George Pataki, Governor of the State of New York, Robert Dennison, Chairman of the New York State Division of Parole and The New York State Division of Parole
Hilton v. Wright
as 10-2245
Plaintiff - Appellant: Robert Hilton, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and Louis Vasquez
Defendant - Appellee: Lester N. Wright, M.D., M.P.H., Associate Commissioner, Chief Medical Officer for the New York State Department of Correctional Services and New York State Department of Correctional Services
Hilton v. Wright We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-135
Plaintiff - Appellant: Robert Hilton, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and Louis Vasquez
Defendant - Appellee: Lester N. Wright and New York State Department of Correctional Services

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?