Cases 61 - 70 of 111
White v. The City of NY & DOC et al
as 1:2015cv07395
Plaintiff:
Shakeem White
Defendant:
The City of NY, Joseph Ponte, Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2015cv01542
Plaintiff:
Woods and Ruthie Woods
Defendant:
The City Of New York, NYC DOC CO Geraldine Williams, M.D. Habib Mohammad and others
Undetermined:
Bronx District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Chaprias et al
as 6:2014cv06689
Plaintiff:
Charles J. Smith
Defendant:
Paul Chappius, M. Porter, Jame Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. NYC et al
as 1:2014cv09799
Plaintiff:
Anselmo Hernandez
Defendant:
NYC and DOC 8
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Chaprias et al
as 1:2014cv09599
Plaintiff:
Charles J. Smith
Defendant:
Paul Chaprias, M. Porter, James Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cary v. DOCS AMKC- 95 et al
as 1:2014cv08285
Plaintiff:
Hubert Cary
Defendant:
DOCS AMKC- 95, Hassan, Captain- C95 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. City of New York (DOC)
as 1:2014cv07371
Plaintiff:
Michael Anderson
Defendant:
City of New York (DOC)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adrian v. Department of Correction of New York City (DOC) et al
as 1:2014cv06467
Plaintiff:
Robert Adrian
Defendant:
Department of Correction of New York City (DOC), Rikers Island Prison and Manhattan Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adrian-Reyes v. Department of Corrections of New York City (DOC) et al
as 1:2014cv06291
Plaintiff:
Miguel Adrian-Reyes
Defendant:
Department of Corrections of New York City (DOC) and Rikers Island Prision
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Enabnit v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv05933
Plaintiff:
John Eugene Enabnit
Defendant:
City of New York, NYC DOC, NYC Dept. of Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
