Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Baxter v. Shukla et al
as 1:2018cv10302
Defendant:
Claire Shukla and George Trowse
Plaintiff:
Arlene Baxter
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Victorian Restaurant and Tavern, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv01352
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Victorian Restaurant and Tavern, LLC, Waverly Restaurant, LLC, K.T. Baxter's, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Besson v. Hamilton Heights Enterprise, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv08160
Plaintiff:
Angela Besson
Defendant:
Hamilton Heights Enterprise, LLC and Paul Baxter Lanius
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pippins v. KPMG LLP
as 13-889
Plaintiff:
Lisa B. Fraley, Stephen Marsala, Jr., Joshua Adam Mandelberger and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kyle Pippins, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Jamie Schindler, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Edward Lambert
Defendant - Appellee:
KPMG LLP
Ramsarran v. Hamilton Heights Enterprises, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv10369
Plaintiff:
Raphael Ramsarran
Defendant:
Hamilton Heights Enterprises, LLC, New Ebony Hotel, Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Forbes v. Perci's Jerk Hut Restaurants, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv03501
Plaintiff:
Lateisha Forbes, Lateisha Forbes and Lateisha Forbes
Defendant:
Perci's Jerk Hut Restaurants, Inc. and Percival Baxter
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Albrecht et al v. The Wackenhut Corporation
as 6:2007cv06162
Plaintiff:
Roderick Albrecht, Alicia Bablo, Brad Baker and others
Defendant:
The Wackenhut Corporation, The Wackenhut Corporation and The Wackenhut Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Sherrill et al v. Sutherland Global Services, Inc. et al
as 6:2005cv06537
Plaintiff:
Margarita Sherrill, Tony Falso, Jon Stewart and others
Defendant:
Sutherland Global Services, Inc. and The Sutherland Group, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
