Cases 61 - 70 of 3,176
Upstate Iron Worker Employers' Association, Inc. v. International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and Reinforcing Ironworkers, Local Union No. 6 et al
as 1:2023cv01243
Plaintiff:
Upstate Iron Worker Employers' Association, Inc.
Defendant:
International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and Reinforcing Ironworkers, Local Union No. 6, International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and Reinforcing Ironworkers, Local Union No. 9, International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and Reinforcing Ironworkers, Local Union No. 12 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Madison Acquisition Group, LLC v. Local 259, United Auto Workers, AFL-CIO, et al
as 2:2023cv07770
Plaintiff:
Madison Acquisition Group, LLC
Defendant:
Local 259, United Auto Workers, AFL-CIO and International Union Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, UAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Trustees of the Drywall Tapers et al v. KPM Construction
as 1:2023cv07495
Plaintiff:
Painters Local Union No. 1974 Benefit Funds, The District Council No. 9, Drywall Tapers and Painters Of Greater New York Local Union 1974, and Affiliated With International Union Of Painters and Allied Trades, AFL-CIO
Petitioner:
Trustees of the Drywall Tapers
Defendant:
KPM Construction
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor: Suits by and against Labor Organizations
Leslie v. Starbucks Corporation
as 23-1194
Petitioner / Appellant:
Linda M. Leslie, Regional Director of the Third Region of the National Labor Relations Board for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Respondent / Appellee:
Starbucks Corporation
Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974, Affiliated with International Union of Allied Painters and Allied Trades, AFL-CIO v. National Drywall Inc.
as 1:2023cv08474
Petitioner:
Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974, Affiliated with International Union of Allied Painters and Allied Trades, AFL-CIO
Respondent:
National Drywall Inc. and National Drywall Inc. a/k/a National Drywall Interior's Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor: Suits by and against Labor Organizations
MADISON ACQUISITION GROUP, LLC v. Local 259, United Auto Workers, AFL-CIO
as 1:2023cv07770
Plaintiff:
MADISON ACQUISITION GROUP, LLC
Defendant:
Local 259, United Auto Workers, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Trustees of the Drywall Tapers et al v. Inc.
as 1:2023cv07505
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Drywall Tapers, Painters Local Union No. 1974 Benefit Funds, The District Council No. 9, Drywall Tapers and Painters Of Greater New York Local Union 1974, and others
Defendant:
Astoria Taping, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor: Suits by and against Labor Organizations
Cornell University v. Tompkins-Cortland Counties Building Trades Council, Maintenance Division
as 3:2023cv01021
Counter Defendant:
Cornell University
Counter Claimant:
Tompkins-Cortland Counties Building Trades Council, Maintenance Division
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Trustees of the Drywall Tapers et al v. Construction Inc.,
as 1:2023cv07499
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Drywall Tapers, Painters Local Union No. 1974 Benefit Funds, The District Council No. 9, Drywall Tapers and Painters Of Greater New York Local Union 1974, and others
Defendant:
Level 5 Construction Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor: Suits by and against Labor Organizations
SAMAP USA Corp. v. International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, District Council 9 et al
as 1:2023cv08153
Plaintiff:
SAMAP USA Corp.
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES, DISTRICT COUNSEL 9, Joint Trade Committee of The Painting and Decorating Industries, International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, District Council 9 and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
