Cases 51 - 60 of 1,499
Bezzek v. Tennant Sales and Service Company
as 6:2023cv06663
Plaintiff:
Robert Bezzek
Defendant:
Tennant Sales and Service Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Neely v. Maximus 909 Operations, LLC
as 1:2023cv01178
Plaintiff:
Kevin Neely
Defendant:
Maximus 909 Operations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Macaluso v. Tantillo Auto Group, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv09519
Plaintiff:
Peter Macaluso
Defendant:
Tantillo Auto Group, LLC, Raymond Tantillo, Thomas Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Morris v. CareCentrix. Inc.
as 1:2023cv08282
Plaintiff:
Darlene Morris
Defendant:
CareCentrix. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Weir v. C&B Delivery LLC et al
as 2:2023cv09097
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Weir
Defendant:
C&B Delivery LLC doing business as Temco Logistics, Home Express Delivery Service, LLC doing business as Temco Logistics and Temco Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Troeger v. JetBlue Airways Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv10859
Plaintiff:
Chadwick Troeger
Defendant:
JetBlue Airways Corporation, William Petersen, Wayne Jr. Mayers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Springett v. Regal Cinemas, Inc.
as 3:2023cv01401
Plaintiff:
Joshua Springett
Defendant:
Regal Cinemas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Ophir v. Koneksa Health Inc et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2023cv09145
Plaintiff:
Gol Ophir
Defendant:
Koneksa Health Inc and Chris Benko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cracchiola v. Motorola Solutions, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01128
Plaintiff:
Rachel Cracchiola
Defendant:
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.