Contract Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Brand v. Lloyds Of London et al
as 2:2015cv06371
Plaintiff: Jason P. Brand
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London, Disability Management Services, Inc., Lloyds Of London and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Arch Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 1:2014cv07510
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London and Certain London Market Insurance Companies subscribing to Policy No. 507/N11NA08244 (Companies), Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London and Certain London Market Insurance Companies subscribing to Policy No. 507/N11NA08242, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London and Certain London Market Insurance Companies subscribing to Policy No. 507/N11NA08241 and others
Defendant: Torus Specialty Insurance Company, Commonwealth Insurance Company, Steadfast Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff: National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 oc
Type: Contract Insurance
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds v. Illinois National Insurance Co
as 13-1646
Plaintiff - Appellee: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London, Issuing Policy Nos. 509/DL458805 and 509/DL460005, Aspen Insurance UK Ltd. and Arch Insurance Company (Europe) Ltd.
Defendant: Illinois National Insurance Company, HartFord Fire Insurance Company, Travelers Insurance Company and others
Defendant - Appellant: Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania and Continental Casualty Company
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds v. Illinois National Insurance Co
as 13-1860
Plaintiff - Appellee: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London, Issuing Policy Nos. 509/DL458805 and 509/DL460005, Aspen Insurance UK Ltd. and Arch Insurance Company (Europe) Ltd.
Defendant: Illinois National Insurance Company, HartFord Fire Insurance Company, Travelers Insurance Company and others
Defendant - Appellant: Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania
Bakoss v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-4371
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant: Imad John Bakoss
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London Issuing Certificate No. 0510135
Federal Insurance Company v. Commerce & Industry Insurance Company et al
as 1:2011cv03945
Plaintiff: Federal Insurance Company
Defendant: Commerce & Industry Insurance Company, Royal Surplus Lines Insurance Company, Landmark American Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101
Type: Contract Insurance
Bakoss v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London Issuing Certificate No. 0510135 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv01455
Plaintiff: M.D. Imad John Bakoss
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London Issuing Certificate No. 0510135
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Type: Contract Insurance
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London v. Illinois National Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv04418
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London
Defendant: Illinois National Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, Continental Casualty Company, Hartford Fire Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Type: Contract None
Woodbury Transportation, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London
as 2:2007cv05159
Plaintiff: Woodbury Transportation, Inc.
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Martin v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London et al
as 1:2007cv02062
Plaintiff: Curtis Martin
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London and HCC Specialty Underwriters Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?