Cases 131 - 140 of 34,520
Glasper v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
Eric Glasper
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Whitney v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00513
Plaintiff:
Terrance Chaz Whitney
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of SSA Decision
Leonard v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
James H. Leonard, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Green v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00837
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Green
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Updike v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Peter F Updike
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kosowski v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06278
Plaintiff:
Elijah J Kosowski
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hopkins v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06279
Plaintiff:
Jamie Hopkins
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hunt v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06280
Plaintiff:
Ryan M. Hunt
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Deault v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
Marcelle Deault
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Frazier v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00842
Plaintiff:
Paul R. Frazier, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
